Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ventilation in low energy residences–a survey on code requirements, implementation barriers and operational challenges from seven European countries

  • D. Zukowska
  • , G. Rojas
  • , E. Burman
  • , G. Guyot
  • , M.D.C. Bocanegra-Yanez
  • , J. Laverge
  • , G. Cao
  • , J. Kolarik
  • Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
  • The Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, Faculty of the Built Environment, UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering
  • BPE Project Team, Centre for Studies and Expertise on Risks, the Environment, Mobility and Urban Planning, France
  • Building Energy Process Laboratory (LOCIE), University of Savoie Mont Blanc
  • Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde
  • Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ghent University
  • Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an interview survey conducted among different stakeholders involved in design, installation and operation of residential ventilation in seven European countries. In total 44 interviews were performed. The results provide a valuable snapshot of current practices and insights into potential barriers and challenges regarding installation of mechanical ventilation in low-energy residences to maintain high indoor air quality (IAQ). The results show that mechanical ventilation with heat recovery is becoming a common choice in new low energy residences in Europe. However, there are countries that apply airing or other types of ventilation such as mechanical exhaust or natural ventilation due to tradition, national legislation, climatic conditions and/or cost reasons. Demand-controlled ventilation (DCV) is often allowed or even recommended in standards, but rarely implemented in practice, except for exhaust-only humidity-based DCV in France and Belgium. The main barriers against mechanical ventilation seem to be high capital cost, space requirements and duct routing. The respondents commonly reported problems resulting from poor construction, lack of commissioning and/or maintenance. The main needs to be identified in the survey were more legislative pushes including more flexibility in legislation, a coordinated approach to energy efficiency and IAQ, and control mechanisms to ensure good implementation and operation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-102
Number of pages20
JournalInt. J. Vent.
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

  • indoor air quality
  • low-energy housing
  • mechanical ventilation with heat recovery
  • Residential ventilation
  • Air quality
  • Energy efficiency
  • Housing
  • Humidity control
  • Indoor air pollution
  • Laws and legislation
  • Mechanisms
  • Surveys
  • Ventilation exhausts
  • Waste heat
  • Demand-controlled ventilation
  • Implementation barriers
  • Indoor air quality
  • Low energy housing
  • Mechanical exhausts
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • National legislation
  • Operational challenges
  • Ventilation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ventilation in low energy residences–a survey on code requirements, implementation barriers and operational challenges from seven European countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this