TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding Game-Based Privacy Proofs for Energy Consumption Aggregation Protocols
AU - Unterweger, A.
AU - Taheri-Boshrooyeh, S.
AU - Eibl, G.
AU - Knirsch, F.
AU - Küpçü, A.
AU - Engel, D.
N1 - Cited By :8
Export Date: 14 December 2023
Correspondence Address: Unterweger, A.; The Center for Secure Energy Informatics, Puch bei Hallein, Austria; email: [email protected]
Funding details: Royal Society, NA140464, TSG-01792-2017
Funding details: European Cooperation in Science and Technology, COST, IC1206
Funding details: Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft, BMWFW
Funding details: Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu, TÜBITAK, 115E766
Funding details: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi
Funding details: Salzburger Landesregierung
Funding text 1: The financial support by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy, the Federal State of Salzburg, the Austrian National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development, EU COST Action IC1206, TÜBITAK (the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) under project number 115E766, the Turkish Academy of Sciences, and the Royal Society of UK under Newton Advanced Fellowship NA140464 are gratefully acknowledged. Paper no. TSG-01792-2017.
References: McKenna, E., Richardson, I., Thomson, M., Smart meter data: Balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications (2012) Energy Policy, 41, pp. 807-814. , Feb; Erkin, Z., Tsudik, G., Private computation of spatial and temporal power consumption with smart meters (2012) Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Appl. Cryptography Netw. Security (ACNS), pp. 561-577; Wicker, S.B., Schrader, D.E., Privacy-aware design principles for information networks (2011) Proc. IEEE, 99 (2), pp. 330-350. , Feb; Eibl, G., Engel, D., Influence of data granularity on smart meter privacy (2015) IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 6 (2), pp. 930-939. , Mar; Erkin, Z., Troncoso-Pastoriza, J.R., Lagendijk, R.L., Perez-Gonzalez, F., Privacy-preserving data aggregation in smart metering systems: An overview (2013) IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 30 (2), pp. 75-86. , Mar; Kursawe, K., Danezis, G., Kohlweiss, M., Privacy-friendly aggregation for the smart-grid (2011) Proc. Privacy Enhanc. Technol. Symp., pp. 175-191; Danezis, G., Fournet, C., Kohlweiss, M., Zanella-Béguelin, S., Smart Meter Aggregation via Secret-sharing (2013) Proc. 1st ACM Workshop Smart Energy Grid Security (SEGS), pp. 75-80; Ács, G., Castelluccia, C., I have a DREAM! (differentially private smart metering) (2011) Proc. Inf. Hiding Conf., pp. 118-132; Knirsch, F., Privacy enhancing technologies in the smart grid user domain (2017) Inf. Technol. Thematic Issue Recent Trends Energy Informat. Res., 1 (59), pp. 13-22; Li, F., Luo, B., Liu, P., Secure information aggregation for smart grids using homomorphic encryption (2010) Proc. IEEE 1st Int. Conf. Smart Grid Commun., pp. 327-332; Danezis, G., Kohlweiss, M., Rial, A., Differentially private billing with rebates (2011) Proc. Int. Workshop Inf. Hiding, pp. 148-162; Borges, F., Martucci, L.A., iKUP keeps users’ privacy in the smart grid (2014) Proc. IEEE Conf. Commun. Netw. Security (CNS), pp. 310-318. , San Francisco, CA, USA; Li, D., Aung, Z., Williams, J.J.R., Sanchez, A., Efficient authentication scheme for data aggregation in smart grid with fault tolerance and fault diagnosis (2012) Proc. Innov. Smart Grid Technol. (ISGT), pp. 1-8. , Washington, DC, USA; Mármol, F.G., Privacy-enhanced architecture for smart metering (2013) Int. J. Inf. Security, 12 (2), pp. 67-82; Castelluccia, C., Chan, A.C.-F., Mykletun, E., Tsudik, G., Efficient and provably secure aggregation of encrypted data in wireless sensor networks (2009) ACM Trans. Sensor Netw., 5 (3), pp. 1-20; Bohli, J.-M., Sorge, C., Ugus, O., A privacy model for smart metering (2010) Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Workshops (ICC), pp. 1-5; Rial, A., Danezis, G., Privacy-preserving smart metering (2011) Proc. 10th Annu. ACM Workshop Privacy Electron. Soc., pp. 49-60; Boshrooyeh, S.T., Küpçü, A., Özkasap, Ö., PPAD: Privacy preserving group-based advertising in online social networks (2018) Proc. IFIPNetworking, pp. 541-549; Daza, V., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Sebé, F., Viejo, A., Trustworthy privacy-preserving car-generated announcements in vehicular ad hoc networks (2009) IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 58 (4), pp. 1876-1886. , May; Buescher, N., Boukoros, S., Bauregger, S., Katzenbeisser, S., Two is not enough: Privacy assessment of aggregation schemes in smart metering (2017) Proc. Privacy Enhanc. Technol., 2017 (4), pp. 118-134; Menezes, A.J., van Oorschot, P.C., Vanstone, S.A., (2001) Handbook of Applied Cryptography, 5th ed., , Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; Guo, Y., Ten, C.-W., Jirutitijaroen, P., Online data validation for distribution operations against cybertampering (2014) IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 29 (2), pp. 550-560. , Mar; Paillier, P., Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes (1999) Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT (LNCS 1592), pp. 223-238. , Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; Engel, D., Wavelet-based load profile representation for smart meter privacy (2013) Proc. IEEE PES Innov. Smart Grid Technol. (ISGT), pp. 1-6. , Washington, DC, USA; Erkin, Z., Private data aggregation with groups for smart grids in a dynamic setting using CRT (2015) Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Inf. Forensics Security (WIFS), pp. 1-6. , Rome, Italy; Barker, E., (2012) NIST 800-57: Computer Security, pp. 1-147. , Gaithersburg, MD, USA; Knirsch, F., Eibl, G., Engel, D., Error-resilient masking approaches for privacy preserving data aggregation (2018) IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 9 (4), pp. 3351-3361. , Jul; Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., Smith, A., Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis (2006) Proc. Theory Cryptography Conf., pp. 265-284; Barker, E., Roginsky, A., (2011) Transitions: Recommendation for Transitioning the Use of Cryptographic Algorithms and Key Lengths, , document SP 800-131A, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; Katz, J., Lindell, Y., (2007) Introduction to Modern Cryptography, 1st ed., , Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman & Hall; Shamir, A., How to share a secret (1979) Commun. ACM, 22 (11), pp. 612-613; Barker, A., (2016) Recommendation for Key Management—Part 1: General (Revised), , http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/80057/sp800-57-Part1-revised2_Mar08-2007.pdf, document SP 800-57, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Despite the large number of privacy-preserving aggregation protocols in the smart grid, there is no common methodology for evaluating and comparing their privacy guarantees. Protocol discussion often lacks a formal evaluation of the proposed privacy guarantees. In order to transfer the well-established formal methodology of game-based proofs to the smart grid domain, in this paper we: 1) present a game-based privacy definition which addresses the privacy requirement to be captured in an aggregation protocol (the definition may be used or extended for other protocols); 2) exemplify our game-based proof technique for two aggregation protocols; and 3) provide a novel and compact way to visualize and easily compare the privacy guarantees of different protocols. We employ two sample protocols that reflect the basis of the most common approaches currently found in the energy aggregation literature. In summary, we contribute a guideline on how to conduct formal evaluations for protocol developers as well as an easy-to-understand way to assess the privacy guarantees of different aggregation protocols for non-experts. © 2018 IEEE.
AB - Despite the large number of privacy-preserving aggregation protocols in the smart grid, there is no common methodology for evaluating and comparing their privacy guarantees. Protocol discussion often lacks a formal evaluation of the proposed privacy guarantees. In order to transfer the well-established formal methodology of game-based proofs to the smart grid domain, in this paper we: 1) present a game-based privacy definition which addresses the privacy requirement to be captured in an aggregation protocol (the definition may be used or extended for other protocols); 2) exemplify our game-based proof technique for two aggregation protocols; and 3) provide a novel and compact way to visualize and easily compare the privacy guarantees of different protocols. We employ two sample protocols that reflect the basis of the most common approaches currently found in the energy aggregation literature. In summary, we contribute a guideline on how to conduct formal evaluations for protocol developers as well as an easy-to-understand way to assess the privacy guarantees of different aggregation protocols for non-experts. © 2018 IEEE.
KW - aggregation
KW - game-based proof
KW - privacy
KW - Smart grid
KW - visualization
KW - Agglomeration
KW - Data privacy
KW - Energy utilization
KW - Flow visualization
KW - Smart power grids
KW - Different protocols
KW - Game-Based
KW - Privacy preserving
KW - Privacy requirements
KW - Electric power transmission networks
U2 - 10.1109/TSG.2018.2883951
DO - 10.1109/TSG.2018.2883951
M3 - Article
SN - 1949-3053
VL - 10
SP - 5514
EP - 5523
JO - IEEE Trans. Smart Grid
JF - IEEE Trans. Smart Grid
IS - 5
ER -