Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 333-343 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | European Management Journal |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2021 |
Keywords
- Absorptive capacity
- Business model design
- Digital transformation
- Exploitative innovation strategy
- Exploratory innovation strategy
- Industrial internet of things
- Industry 4.0
- Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models - A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: European Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, 01.06.2021, p. 333-343.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models - A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises
AU - Müller, J.M.
AU - Buliga, O.
AU - Voigt, K.-I.
N1 - Cited By :183 Export Date: 14 December 2023 Correspondence Address: Müller, J.M.; Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Urstein Süd, Austria; email: [email protected] References: Baden-Fuller, C., Haefliger, S., Business models and technological innovation (2013) Long Range Planning, 46 (6), pp. 419-426; Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L., Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited (2003) Academy of Management Review, 28 (2), pp. 238-256; Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., Hongping, Z., Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects (2009) Organization Science, 20 (4), pp. 781-796; Carmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A., Reliability and validity assessment (1979), Sage Publications; Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition (2006) Management Science, 52 (1), pp. 68-82; Chesbrough, H., Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers (2010) Long Range Planning, 43 (2-3), pp. 354-363; Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation (1990) Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), pp. 128-152; Diamantopoulos, A., Winklhofer, H.M., Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development (2001) Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), pp. 269-277; Duarte, P.A.O., Raposo, M.L.B., A PLS model to study brand preference: An application to the mobile phone market (2010) Handbook of partial least squares, pp. 449-485. , Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Ehret, M., Wirtz, J., Unlocking value from machines: Business models and the industrial internet of things (2017) Journal of Marketing Management, 33 (1-2), pp. 111-130; Enkel, E., Heil, S., Hengstler, M., Wirth, H., Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute? (2017) Technovation, 60/61, pp. 29-38; Fernhaber, S.A., Patel, P.C., How do young firms manage product portfolio complexity? The role of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity (2012) Strategic Management Journal, 33 (13), pp. 1516-1539; Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics (1981) Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (3), pp. 382-388; Foss, N.J., Saebi, T., Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? (2017) Journal of Management, 43 (1), pp. 200-227; Frank, A.G., Mendes, G.H., Ayala, N.F., Ghezzi, A., Servitization and industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective (2019), Technological Forecasting and Social Change (in press); Gebauer, H., Worch, H., Truffer, B., Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation (2012) European Management Journal, 30 (1), pp. 57-73; Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J., The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity (2004) Academy of Management Journal, 47 (2), pp. 209-226; Gulati, R., Puranam, P., Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization (2009) Organization Science, 20 (2), pp. 422-440; Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., Shalley, C.E., The interplay between exploration and exploitation (2006) Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), pp. 693-706; Hair, J.F., Jr., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., A primer on partial Least Squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2016), Sage Publications Thousand Oaks; Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T.M., Ringle, C.M., The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications (2012) Long Range Planning, 56 (5-6). , 320–240; Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling (2015) Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), pp. 115-135; Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R., The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing (2009) Advances in international marketing, 227–320, , R.R. Sinkovics P.N. Ghauri Emerald Publishing Bingley; Hill, C.W.L., Rothaermel, F.T., The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation (2003) Academy of Management Review, 28 (2), pp. 257-274; Hu, B., Linking business models with technological innovation performance through organizational learning (2014) European Management Journal, 32 (4), pp. 587-595; Jacobides, M.G., Knudsen, T., Augier, M., Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures (2006) Research Policy, 35 (8), pp. 1200-1221; Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W., Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators (2006) Management Science, 52 (11), pp. 1661-1674; Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J., Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group (2013), Acatech Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Arnold, C., Voigt, K.I., Sustainable industrial value creation: Benefits and challenges of industry 4.0 (2017) International Journal of Innovation Management, 21 (8); Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kammerlander, N., Motivation gaps and implementation traps: The paradoxical and time-varying effects of family ownership on firm absorptive capacity (2020) Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37 (1), pp. 2-25; Kranz, J.J., Hanelt, A., Kolbe, L.M., Understanding the influence of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity on the process of business model change – the case of on- premise and cloud-computing software (2016) Information Systems Journal, 26 (5), pp. 477-517; Lambert, S.C., Davidson, R.A., Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, innovation and classification: An analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010 (2013) European Management Journal, 31 (6), pp. 668-681; Lane, P.J., Koka, B.R., Pathak, S., The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenatin of the construct (2006) Academy of Management Review, 31 (4), pp. 833-863; Lavie, D., Stettner, U., Tushman, M.L., Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations (2010) The Academy of Management Annals, 4 (1), pp. 109-155; Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., Veiga, J.F., Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium- sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration (2006) Journal of Management, 32 (5), pp. 646-672; Markides, C., Business model innovation: What can the ambidexterity literature teach us? (2013) Academy of Management Perspectives, 27 (4), pp. 313-323; Massa, L., Tucci, C., Afuah, A., A critical assessment of business model research (2017) The Academy of Management Annals, 11 (1), pp. 73-104; Metallo, C., Agrifoglio, R., Schiavone, F., Mueller, J., Understanding business model in the Internet of Things industry (2018) Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, pp. 298-306; Müller, J.M., Buliga, O., Voigt, K.I., Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0 (2018) Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, pp. 2-17; Müller, J.M., Voigt, K.I., Sustainable industrial value creation in SMEs: A comparison between industry 4.0 and made in China 2025 (2018) International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 5 (5), pp. 659-670; Nunnally, J., Psychometric theory (1978), McGraw-Hill New York; Oesterreich, T.D., Teuteberg, F., Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry (2016) Computers in Industry, 83, pp. 121-139; O'Reilly, C., Tushman, M., Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovators’ dilemma (2008) Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, pp. 185-206; Phene, A., Tallman, S., Almeida, P., When do acquisitions facilitate technological exploration and exploitation? (2012) Journal of Management, 38 (3), pp. 753-783; Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies (2003) Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), pp. 879-903; Porter, M.E., Heppelmann, J.E., How smart, connected products are transforming companies (2015) Harvard Business Review, 93 (10), pp. 96-114; Rangus, K., Slavec, A., The interplay of decentralization, employee involvement and absorptive capacity on firms’ innovation and business performance (2017) Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, pp. 195-203; Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., Henseler, J., An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM (2009) International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26 (4), pp. 332-344; Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M., SmartPLS 3 (2014), SmartPLS Hamburg; Rothaermel, F.T., Alexandre, M.T., Ambidexterity in technology sourcing (2009) Organization Science, 20 (4), pp. 759-780; Saebi, T., Foss, N.J., Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions (2015) European Management Journal, 33 (3), pp. 201-213; Taran, Y., Boer, H., Lindgren, P., A business model innovation typology (2015) Decision Sciences, 46 (2), pp. 301-331; Teece, D.J., Business models, business strategy and innovation (2010) Long Range Planning, 43 (2), pp. 172-194; Veile, J.W., Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Voigt, K.I., Lessons learned from Industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry (2019) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management; Voorhees, C.M., Brady, M.K., Calantone, R., Ramirez, E., Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies (2016) Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (1), pp. 119-134; Wei, Z., Yang, D., Sun, B., Gu, M., The fit between technological innovation and business model design for firm growth: Evidence from China (2014) R & D Management, 44 (3), pp. 288-305; West, J., Bogers, M., Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation (2014) Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31 (4), pp. 814-831; Zahra, S.A., George, G., Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension (2002) Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), pp. 185-203; Zott, C., Amit, R., The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance (2008) Strategic Management Journal, 29 (1), pp. 1-26
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - Technological innovations often lead to redesigns in the business models of established companies, requiring them to incorporate new external knowledge into internal activities. Against this background, this study integrates the concepts of business model design, absorptive capacity, and innovation strategy into a novel research model, which analyzes the redesign of established business models in response to the emergence of Industry 4.0. Industry 4.0, also known as the Industrial Internet of Things, constitutes a contemporary research context that is highly relevant for corporate practice but scarcely regarded in management literature until now. The article contains an analysis of data from 221 German industrial enterprises, conducted through structural equation modeling, with separate data for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large enterprises. First, the results indicate that the acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation of knowledge from the environment enable companies to engage in both exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies. Furthermore, the paper includes an evaluation of the role of exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies that reflects in efficiency-centered and novelty-centered business model designs. The distinct characteristics differentiating SMEs from large enterprises are also explained. The implications of absorptive capacity on innovation strategies, which influence the redesign of extant business models, are discussed from a research and managerial perspective.
AB - Technological innovations often lead to redesigns in the business models of established companies, requiring them to incorporate new external knowledge into internal activities. Against this background, this study integrates the concepts of business model design, absorptive capacity, and innovation strategy into a novel research model, which analyzes the redesign of established business models in response to the emergence of Industry 4.0. Industry 4.0, also known as the Industrial Internet of Things, constitutes a contemporary research context that is highly relevant for corporate practice but scarcely regarded in management literature until now. The article contains an analysis of data from 221 German industrial enterprises, conducted through structural equation modeling, with separate data for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large enterprises. First, the results indicate that the acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation of knowledge from the environment enable companies to engage in both exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies. Furthermore, the paper includes an evaluation of the role of exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies that reflects in efficiency-centered and novelty-centered business model designs. The distinct characteristics differentiating SMEs from large enterprises are also explained. The implications of absorptive capacity on innovation strategies, which influence the redesign of extant business models, are discussed from a research and managerial perspective.
KW - Absorptive capacity
KW - Business model design
KW - Digital transformation
KW - Exploitative innovation strategy
KW - Exploratory innovation strategy
KW - Industrial internet of things
KW - Industry 4.0
KW - Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5a2a5b7a-ca21-3bda-aab6-5692b0903f45/
U2 - 10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002
M3 - Article
SN - 0263-2373
VL - 39
SP - 333
EP - 343
JO - European Management Journal
JF - European Management Journal
IS - 3
ER -