TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship follows technology! How Industry 4.0 reshapes future buyer-supplier relationships
AU - Veile, J.W.
AU - Schmidt, M.-C.
AU - Müller, J.M.
AU - Voigt, K.-I.
N1 - Cited By :31
Export Date: 14 December 2023
Correspondence Address: Müller, J.M.; Salzburg University of Applied SciencesAustria; email: [email protected]
References: Abdel-Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Mohamed, M., Internet of Things (IoT) and its impact on supply chain: a framework for building smart, secure and efficient systems (2018) Future Generation Computer Systems, 86, pp. 614-628; Bag, S., Telukdarie, A., Pretorius, J.H.C., Gupta, S., Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: framework and future research directions (2018) Benchmarking: An International Journal, , ahead-of-print ahead-of-print; Barreto, L., Amaral, A., Pereira, T., Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview (2017) Procedia Manufacturing, 13, pp. 1245-1252; Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., Bahroun, Z., Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review (2019) International Journal of Production Research, 57 (15-16), pp. 1-24; Bienhaus, F., Haddud, A., Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitization of procurement and supply chains (2018) Business Process Management Journal, 24 (4), pp. 965-984; Büyüközkan, G., Göçer, F., Digital supply chain: literature review and a proposed framework for future research (2018) Computers in Industry, 97, pp. 157-177; Calatayud, A., Mangan, J., Christopher, M., The self-thinking supply chain (2018) Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 115 (6), pp. 22-37; Dedrick, J., Xu, S.X., Zhu, K.X., How does information technology shape supply-chain structure? Evidence on the number of suppliers (2008) Journal of Management Information Systems, 25 (2), pp. 41-72; Dweekat, A.J., Hwang, G., Park, J., A supply chain performance measurement approach using the internet of things: toward more practical SCPMS (2017) Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117 (2), pp. 267-286; Edmondson, A.C., McManus, S.E., Methodological fit in management field research (2007) Academy of Management Review, 32 (4), pp. 1246-1264; Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E., Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges (2007) Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), pp. 25-32; Ghadge, A., Kara, M.E., Moradlou, H., Goswami, M., The impact of Industry 4.0 implementation on supply chains (2020) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31 (4), pp. 669-686; Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., Hamilton, A.L., Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology (2013) Organizational Research Methods, 16 (1), pp. 15-31; Gottge, S., Menzel, T., Forslund, H., Industry 4.0 technologies in the purchasing process (2020) Industrial Management and Data Systems, 120 (4), pp. 730-748; Haddud, A., DeSouza, A., Khare, A., Lee, H., Examining potential benefits and challenges associated with the Internet of Things integration in supply chains (2017) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28 (8), pp. 1055-1085; Hofmann, E., Rüsch, M., Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics (2017) Computers in Industry, 89, pp. 23-34; Holsti, O.R., (1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, , Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA; Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J., (2013) Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0 – Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, , Industry-Science Research Alliance, Frankfurt am Main; Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Arnold, C., Voigt, K.I., Sustainable industrial value creation: benefits and challenges of Industry 4.0 (2017) International Journal of Innovation Management, 21 (8); Krippendorff, K., (2013) Content Analysis, , Sage, Los Angeles, CA; Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V., Whang, S., Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect (2004) Management Science, 50 (12), pp. 1875-1886; Legenvre, H., Henke, M., Ruile, H., Making sense of the impact of the internet of things on purchasing and supply management: a tension perspective (2020) Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26 (1); Manavalan, E., Jayakrishna, K., A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements (2019) Computers and Industrial Engineering, 127, pp. 925-953; Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A., (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, , Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA; Müller, J.M., Business model innovation in small-and medium-sized enterprises: strategies for industry 4.0 providers and users (2019) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30 (8), pp. 1127-1142; Müller, J.M., Buliga, O., Voigt, K.-I., Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in industry 4.0 (2018) Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, pp. 2-17; Müller, J.M., Buliga, O., Voigt, K.-I., The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of Industry 4.0 business models - a comparison between SMEs and large enterprises (2020) European Management Journal, ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print; Obal, M., Lancioni, R.A., Maximizing buyer–supplier relationships in the digital era: concept and research agenda (2013) Industrial Marketing Management, 42 (6), pp. 851-854; Olhager, J., Strategic positioning of the order penetration point (2003) International Journal of Production Economics, 85 (3), pp. 319-329; Osmonbekov, T., Johnston, W.J., Adoption of the internet of things technologies in business procurement: impact on organizational buying behavior (2018) Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 33 (6), pp. 781-791; Papert, M., Pflaum, A., Development of an ecosystem model for the realization of internet of things (IoT) services in supply chain management (2017) Electronic Markets, 27 (2), pp. 175-189; Porter, M.E., Heppelmann, J.E., How smart connected products are transforming competition (2014) Harvard Business Review, 92, pp. 64-88; Schmidt, M.-C., Veile, J.W., Müller, J.M., Voigt, K.-I., Kick-start for connectivity - how to implement digital platforms successfully in industry 4.0 (2019) Technology Innovation Management Review, 9 (10), pp. 5-15; Thun, J.H., Angles of integration: an empirical analysis of the alignment of internet-based information technology and global supply chain integration (2010) Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46 (2), pp. 30-44; Tjahjono, B., Esplugues, C., Ares, E., Pelaez, G., What does industry 4.0 mean to supply chain? (2017) Procedia Manufacturing, 13, pp. 1175-1182; Tu, M., An exploratory study of Internet of Things (IoT) adoption intention in logistics and supply chain management: a mixed research approach (2018) The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29 (1), pp. 131-151; Vanpoucke, E., Vereecke, A., Boyer, K.K., Triggers and patterns of integration initiatives in successful buyer–supplier relationships (2013) Journal of Operations Management, 32, pp. 15-33; Vanpoucke, E., Vereecke, A., Muylle, S., Leveraging the impact of supply chain integration through information technology (2017) International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37 (4), pp. 510-530; Veile, J.W., Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Voigt, K.-I., Lessons learned from Industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry (2019) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print; Villena, V.H., Revilla, E., Choi, T.Y., The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: a social capital perspective (2010) Journal of Operations Management, 29 (6), pp. 561-576; Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., Gimenez, C., McIvor, R., Risk, risk management practices, and the success of supply chain integration (2016) International Journal of Production Economics, 171 (3), pp. 361-370; Wikner, J., Bäckstrand, J., Triadic perspective on customization and supplier inter-action in customer-driven manufacturing (2018) Production and Manufacturing Research, 6 (1), pp. 3-25; Wu, L., Yue, X., Jin, A., Yen, D.C., Smart supply chain management: a review and implications for future research (2016) The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27 (2), pp. 395-417
PY - 2020/8/22
Y1 - 2020/8/22
N2 - Purpose: This study analyzes how technological changes in the context of Industry 4.0 influence buyer-supplier relationships (BSRs). Design/methodology/approach: The study is explorative in nature; hence, an empirical qualitative research design is applied. It bases on 45 expert interviews with managers from German and Austrian industrial companies as empirical data. A qualitative content analysis is conducted to inductively analyze the empirical material and to identify common patterns, themes and categories. Findings: The paper finds that future transactions are mainly based on digitized, automated procedures, transferring various value creation processes to platforms. BSRs become more intense in nature. Companies consolidate their supplier base by focusing on important strategic suppliers. Research limitations/implications: As the paper is of exploratory nature, it can only present first qualitative insights. Further studies can extend the results by analyzing and contrasting BSRs in various industries or value chain stages and map differences and similarities, respectively. Practical implications: The paper's results provide implications for management and corporate practice alike. These help companies to raise Industry 4.0's full potential as for BSRs creating and securing long-term and sustainable competitive advantages. Originality/value: This paper is among the first to empirically investigate BSRs in the context of Industry 4.0. Providing implications for research and corporate practice, it contributes to tapping Industry 4.0's full potential complementing an extra-organizational perspective.
AB - Purpose: This study analyzes how technological changes in the context of Industry 4.0 influence buyer-supplier relationships (BSRs). Design/methodology/approach: The study is explorative in nature; hence, an empirical qualitative research design is applied. It bases on 45 expert interviews with managers from German and Austrian industrial companies as empirical data. A qualitative content analysis is conducted to inductively analyze the empirical material and to identify common patterns, themes and categories. Findings: The paper finds that future transactions are mainly based on digitized, automated procedures, transferring various value creation processes to platforms. BSRs become more intense in nature. Companies consolidate their supplier base by focusing on important strategic suppliers. Research limitations/implications: As the paper is of exploratory nature, it can only present first qualitative insights. Further studies can extend the results by analyzing and contrasting BSRs in various industries or value chain stages and map differences and similarities, respectively. Practical implications: The paper's results provide implications for management and corporate practice alike. These help companies to raise Industry 4.0's full potential as for BSRs creating and securing long-term and sustainable competitive advantages. Originality/value: This paper is among the first to empirically investigate BSRs in the context of Industry 4.0. Providing implications for research and corporate practice, it contributes to tapping Industry 4.0's full potential complementing an extra-organizational perspective.
KW - Buyer-supplier relationships
KW - Industrial Internet of Things
KW - Industry 4.0
KW - Supplier relations
KW - Supply Chain Management
KW - Commerce
KW - Competition
KW - Buyer supplier relationship
KW - Design/methodology/approach
KW - Industrial companies
KW - Organizational perspectives
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Sustainable competitive advantages
KW - Technological change
KW - Value creation process
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f6933832-309d-3854-88f6-7b9743d36744/
U2 - 10.1108/jmtm-09-2019-0318
DO - 10.1108/jmtm-09-2019-0318
M3 - Article
SN - 1741-038X
VL - 32
SP - 1245
EP - 1266
JO - Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
JF - Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
IS - 6
ER -