TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting and Correlating the Strength Properties of Wood Composite Process Parameters by Use of Boosted Regression Tree Models
AU - Carty, D.M.
AU - Young, T.M.
AU - Zaretzki, R.L.
AU - Guess, F.M.
AU - Petutschnigg, A.
N1 - Cited By :15
Export Date: 14 December 2023
CODEN: FPJOA
Correspondence Address: Young, T.M.; Inst. of Agric, United States; email: [email protected]
References: (2014) 2014 AF&PA Sustainability Report, , http://www.afandpa.org/docs/default-source/one-pagers/-2014-sustainability-report.pdf, American Forest Paper Association Accessed March 2, 2015; Andre, N., Cho, H.-W., Baek, S.H., Jeong, M.-K., Young, T.M., Enhanced prediction of internal bond strength in a medium density fiberboard process using multivariate statistical methods and variable selection (2008) Wood Sci. Technol, 42 (7), pp. 521-534; Andre, N., Young, T.M., Real-time process modeling of particleboard manufacture using variable selection and regression methods ensemble (2013) Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod, 71 (3), pp. 361-370; (2013) Standard Test Method for Surface Bond Strength of Wood-base Fiber and Particle Panel Materials, , ASTM International. ASTM D5651-13. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania; Bernardy, G., Scherff, B., Saving costs with process control engineering and statistical process optimization: Uses for production managers, technologists and operators (1998) Proceedings of the Second European Panel Products Symposium (EPPS), pp. 95-106. , October 21-22, 1998 Llandudno, Wales, UK; BioComposites Centre, UWB, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK; Bishop, C.M., (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, p. 729. , Springer New York; Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J., (1984) Classification and Regression Trees, p. 276. , Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, California; Clapp, N.E., Jr., Young, T.M., Guess, F.M., Predictive modeling the internal bond of medium density fiberboard using a modified principal components analysis (2008) Forest Prod. J, 58 (4), pp. 49-55; Cook, D.F., Chiu, C.C., Predicting the internal bond strength of particleboard utilizing a radial basis function neural network (1997) Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell, 10 (2), pp. 171-177; Cook, D.F., Ragsdale, C.T., Major, R.L., Combining a neural network with a genetic algorithm for process parameter optimization (2000) Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell, 13, pp. 391-396; Elith, J., Leathwick, J.R., Hastie, T., A working guide to boosted regression trees (2008) J. Anim. Ecol, 77, pp. 802-813; Eriksson, L., Hagberg, P., Johansson, E., Rannar, S., Whelehan, O., Astrom, A., Lindgren, T., Multivariate process monitoring of a newsprint mill: Application to modeling and predicting COD load resulting from de-inking of recycled paper (2000) J. Chemom, 15, pp. 337-352; Friedman, J.H., Stochastic gradient boosting (2002) Comput. Stat. Data Anal, 38 (4), pp. 367-378; Gleser, L.J., Comment on bootstrap confidence intervals by T (1996) J. DiCiccio and B. Enfron. Stat. Sci, 11, pp. 219-221; Greubel, D., Practical experiences with a process simulation model in particleboard and MDF production (1999) Proceedings of the Second European Wood-Based Panel Symposium, pp. 8-10. , September 1999 Hannover, Germany; Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.H., (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, p. 319. , Springer New York; Lei, Y.C., Zhang, S.Y., Jiang, Z.H., Models for predicting lumber bending MOR and MOE based on tree and stand characteristics in black spruce (2005) Wood Sci. Technol, 39 (1), pp. 37-47; Loh, W.-Y., Regression trees with unbiased variable selection and interaction detection (2002) Stat. Sin, 12 (2), pp. 361-386; Loh, W.-Y., (2008) Classification and Regression Tree Methods, pp. 315-323. , Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability. F. Ruggeri, R. Kenett, and F. W. Faltin (Eds.). Wiley New York; Mora, C.R., Schimleck, L.R., Kernel regression methods for the prediction of wood properties of Pinus taeda using near infrared spectroscopy (2011) Wood Sci. Technol, 44 (4), pp. 561-578; Morgan, J., Sonquist, J., Problems in the analysis of survey data, and a proposal (1963) J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 58 (302), pp. 415-434; Quinlan, J.R., (1993) C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning, p. 241. , Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco. ISBN:1-55860-238-0; Riegler, M., Spangl, B., Weigl, M., Wimmer, R., Muller, U., Simulation of a real-time process adaptation in the manufacture of high-density fiberboards using multivariate regression analysis and feed forward control (2013) Wood Sci. Technol, 47, pp. 1243-1259; Schapire, R.E., (2003) The Boosting Approach to Machine Learning: An Overview, pp. 113-141. , MSRI Workshop on Nonlinear Estimation and Classification, 2002. D. D. Denison, M. H. Hansen, C. Holmes, B. Mallick, and B. Yu (Eds.). Springer New York; Schonlan, M., Boosted regression (boosting): An introductory tutorial and a Stata plugin (2005) Stata J, 5 (3), pp. 330-354; Sjoblom, E., Johnsson, B., Sundstrom, H., Optimization of particleboard production using NIR spectroscopy and multivariate techniques (2004) Forest Prod. J, 54 (6), pp. 71-75; Xing, C., Zhang, S.Y., Deng, J., Wang, S.Q., Investigation of the effects of bark fiber as core material and its resin content on threelayer MDF performance by response surface methodology (2007) Wood Sci. Technol, 41 (7), pp. 585-595; Young, T.M., Process improvement through real-time statistical process control in MDF manufacture (1996) Proceedings of Process and Business Technologies for the Forest Products Industry, pp. 50-51. , July 29-31, 1996 Madison, Wisconsin; Forest Products Society, Madison, Wisconsin; Young, T.M., Andre, N., Huber, C.W., Predictive modeling of the internal bond of MDF using genetic algorithms with distributed data fusion (2004) Proceedings of the Eighth European Panel Products Symposium, pp. 45-59. , October 13-15, 2004 Llandudno, Wales, UK BioComposites Centre, UWB, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK; Young, T.M., Clapp, N.E., Jr., Guess, F.M., Chen, C.-H., Predicting key reliability response with limited response data (2014) Qual. Eng, 26 (2), pp. 223-232; Young, T.M., Guess, F.M., Developing and mining higher quality information in automated relational databases for forest products manufacture (2002) Int. J. Reliab. Appl, 3 (4), pp. 155-164; Young, T.M., Shaffer, L.B., Guess, F.M., Bensmail, H., Leon, R.V., A comparison of multiple linear regression and quantile regression for modeling the internal bond of medium density fiberboard (2008) Forest Prod. J, 58 (4), pp. 39-48
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Predictive boosted regression tree (BRT) models were developed to predict modulus of rupture (MOR) and internal bond (IB) for a US particleboard manufacturer. The temporal process data consisted of 4,307 records and spanned the time frame from March 2009 to June 2010. This study builds on previous published research by developing BRT models across all product types of MOR and IB produced by the particleboard manufacturer. A total of 189 continuous variables from the process line were used as possible predictor variables. BRT model comparisons were made using the root mean squared error for prediction (RMSEP) and the RMSEP relative to the mean of the response variable as a percent (RMSEP%) for the validation data sets. For MOR, RMSEP values ranged from 1.051 to 1.443 MPa, and RMSEP% values ranged from 8.5 to 11.6 percent. For IB, RMSEP values ranged from 0.074 to 0.108 MPa, and RMSEP% values ranged from 12.7 to 18.6 percent. BRT models for MOR and IB predicted better than respective regression tree models without boosting. For MOR, key predictors in the BRT models were related to ''pressing temperature zones,'' ''thickness of pressing,'' and ''pressing pressure.'' For IB, key predictors in the BRT models were related to ''thickness of pressing.'' The BRT predictive models offer manufacturers an opportunity to improve the understanding of processes and be more predictive in the outcomes of product quality attributes. This may help manufacturers reduce rework and scrap and also improve production efficiencies by avoiding unnecessarily high operating targets. © Forest Products Society 2015.
AB - Predictive boosted regression tree (BRT) models were developed to predict modulus of rupture (MOR) and internal bond (IB) for a US particleboard manufacturer. The temporal process data consisted of 4,307 records and spanned the time frame from March 2009 to June 2010. This study builds on previous published research by developing BRT models across all product types of MOR and IB produced by the particleboard manufacturer. A total of 189 continuous variables from the process line were used as possible predictor variables. BRT model comparisons were made using the root mean squared error for prediction (RMSEP) and the RMSEP relative to the mean of the response variable as a percent (RMSEP%) for the validation data sets. For MOR, RMSEP values ranged from 1.051 to 1.443 MPa, and RMSEP% values ranged from 8.5 to 11.6 percent. For IB, RMSEP values ranged from 0.074 to 0.108 MPa, and RMSEP% values ranged from 12.7 to 18.6 percent. BRT models for MOR and IB predicted better than respective regression tree models without boosting. For MOR, key predictors in the BRT models were related to ''pressing temperature zones,'' ''thickness of pressing,'' and ''pressing pressure.'' For IB, key predictors in the BRT models were related to ''thickness of pressing.'' The BRT predictive models offer manufacturers an opportunity to improve the understanding of processes and be more predictive in the outcomes of product quality attributes. This may help manufacturers reduce rework and scrap and also improve production efficiencies by avoiding unnecessarily high operating targets. © Forest Products Society 2015.
KW - Forestry
KW - Manufacture
KW - Mean square error
KW - Particle board
KW - Regression analysis
KW - Boosted regression trees
KW - Continuous variables
KW - Predictor variables
KW - Pressing temperature
KW - Production efficiency
KW - Quality attributes
KW - Regression tree models
KW - Root mean squared errors
KW - Forecasting
U2 - 10.13073/FPJ-D-12-00085
DO - 10.13073/FPJ-D-12-00085
M3 - Article
SN - 0015-7473
VL - 65
SP - 365
EP - 371
JO - Forest Products Journal
JF - Forest Products Journal
IS - 7-8
ER -