TY - JOUR
T1 - Memory traces formed in utero—newborns’ autonomic and neuronal responses to prenatal stimuli and the maternal voice
AU - Lang, A.
AU - Ott, P.
AU - Giudice, R.
AU - Schabus, M.
N1 - Cited By :4
Export Date: 14 December 2023
Correspondence Address: Lang, A.; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience (CCNS), Austria; email: [email protected]
Correspondence Address: Lang, A.; Laboratory for Sleep, Austria; email: [email protected]
Funding details: Austrian Science Fund, FWF, W1233-G17
Funding text 1: Funding: Adelheid Lang and Renate del Giudice were supported by the Doctoral College “Imaging the Mind” (FWF; W1233-G17).
References: Dubois, J., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Kulikova, S., Poupon, C., Hüppi, P.S., Hertz-Pannier, L., The early development of brain white matter: A review of imaging studies in fetuses, newborns and infants (2014) Neuroscience, 276, pp. 48-71. , [CrossRef]; Borsani, E., Della Vedova, A.M., Rezzani, R., Rodella, L.F., Cristini, C., Correlation between human nervous system development and acquisition of fetal skills: An overview (2019) Brain Dev, 41, pp. 225-233. , [CrossRef]; Sandman, C.A., Davis, E.P., Buss, C., Glynn, L.M., Prenatal programming of human neurological function (2011) Int. J. Pept, 2011, p. 837596. , [CrossRef]; James, D.K., Spencer, C.J., Stepsis, B.W., Fetal learning: A prospective randomized controlled study (2002) Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol, 20, pp. 431-438. , [CrossRef] [PubMed]; Hepper, P.G., An examination of fetal learning before and after birth (1991) Ir. J. Psychol, 12, pp. 95-107. , [CrossRef]; Kisilevsky, B.S., Hains, S.M.J., Exploring the relationship beetween fetal heart rate and cognition (2010) Infant Child Dev, 19, pp. 60-75. , [CrossRef]; James, D.K., Fetal Learning: A Critical Review (2010) Infant and Child Dev, 19, pp. 45-54. , [CrossRef]; Gonzalez-Gonzalez, N.L., Suarez, M.N., Perez-Pinero, B., Armas, H., Domenech, E., Bartha, J.L., Persistance of fetal memory into neonatal life (2006) Acta Obstet. Gynecol, 85, pp. 1160-1164. , [CrossRef] [PubMed]; DeCasper, A.J., Fifer, W.P., Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices (1980) Science, 208, pp. 1174-1176. , [CrossRef]; Fifer, W.P., Moon, C., Psychobiology of newborn auditory preferences (1989) Semin. Perinatol, 13, pp. 430-433; Hepper, P.G., Scott, D., Shahidullah, S., Newborn and fetal response to maternal voice (1993) J. Reprod. Infant Psychol, 11, pp. 147-153. , [CrossRef]; Beauchemin, M., Gonzalez-Frankenberger, B., Tremblay, J., Vannasing, P., Martínez-Montes, E., Belin, P., Beland, R., Wallois, F., Mother and Stranger: An electrophysiological study of voice processing in newborns (2010) Cereb. Cortex, 21, pp. 1705-1711. , [CrossRef] [PubMed]; Ahmadi Vastani, M., Zahedpasha, Y., Jafarian Amiri, S.R., Khafri, S., Farhadi, R., The Effect of Experience on Recognition of Mother’s Voice in Preterm Infants (2017) Nurs. Midwifery Stud, 6, p. e40964; Picciolini, O., Porro, M., Meazza, A., Giannì, M.L., Rivoli, C., Lucco, G., Barretta, F., Mosca, F., Early exposure to maternal voice: Effects on preterm infants development (2014) Early Hum. Dev, 90, pp. 287-292. , [CrossRef]; Rand, K., Lahav, A., Maternal sounds elicit lower heart rate in preterm newborns in the first month of life (2014) Early Hum. Dev, 90, pp. 679-683. , [CrossRef]; Arnon, S.D., Bauer, S.C., Regev, R., Sirota, G., Litmanovitz, I., Maternal singing during kangaroo care led to autonomic stability in preterm infants and reduced maternal anxiety (2014) Acta Paediatr, 103, pp. 1039-1044. , [CrossRef]; Granier-Deferre, C., Bassereau, S., Ribeiro, A., Jacquet, A.Y., DeCasper, A.J., A melodic contour repeatedly experienced by human near-term fetuses elicits a profound cardiac reaction one month after birth (2011) PLoS ONE, 6, p. e17304. , [CrossRef]; DeCasper, A.J., Spence, M.J., Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds (1986) Infant Behav. Dev, 9, pp. 133-150. , [CrossRef]; Byers-Heinlein, K., Burns, T.C., Werker, J.F., The roots of bilingualism in newborns (2010) Psychol. Sci, 21, pp. 343-348. , [CrossRef]; Moon, C., Lagercrantz, H., Kuhl, P.K., Language experienced in utero affects vowel perception after birth: A two-country study (2013) Acta Paediatr, 102, pp. 156-160. , [CrossRef]; May, L., Byers-Heinlein, K., Gervain, J., Werker, J.F., Language and the newborn brain: Does prenatal language experience shape the neonate neurol response to speech? (2011) Front. Psychol, 2, p. 9. , [CrossRef] [PubMed]; Mampe, B., Friederici, A.D., Christophe, A., Wermke, K., Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language (2009) Curr. Biol, 19, pp. 1994-1997. , [CrossRef] [PubMed]; Peña, M., Pittaluga, E., Mehler, J., Language acquisition in premature and full-term infants (2010) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, pp. 3823-3828. , [CrossRef] [PubMed]; Partanen, E., Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., Huotilainen, M., Prenatal music exposure induces long-term neural effects (2013) PLoS ONE, 8, p. e78946. , [CrossRef]; Partanen, E., Kujala, T., Näätänen, R., Liitola, A., Sambeth, A., Huotilainen, M., Learning-induced neural plasticity of speech processing before birth (2013) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, pp. 15145-15150. , [CrossRef] [PubMed]; Lang, A., del Giudice, R., Schabus, M., Sleep, Little Baby: The Calming Effects of Prenatal Speech Exposure on Newborns’ Sleep and Heartrate (2020) Brain Sci, 10, p. 511. , [CrossRef]; Richards, J.E., Casey, B.J., Heart rate variability during attention phases in young infants (1991) Psychophysiology, 28, pp. 43-53. , [CrossRef]; (2013), https://www.audacityteam.org/, Audacity, Version 2.0.5; iWeb Media Ltd.: Birkirkara, Malta, (accessed on 11 November 2020); (2003), https://www.neurobs.com/, Presentation, Version 0.71; NeuroBehavioral Systems: Berkeley, CA, USA, (accessed on 11 November 2020); Gerhardt, K.J., Abrams, R.M., Fetal hearing: Characterization of the stimulus and response (1996) Semin. Perinatol, 20, pp. 11-20. , [CrossRef]; (2014), https://www.egi.com/, Geodesics EEG System 400; Electrical Geodesics Inc.: Eugene, OR, USA, (accessed on 11 November 2020); (2018), https://de.mathworks.com, Matlab, Version R2018b; MathWorks: Natick, MA, USA, (accessed on 11 November 2020); Blechert, J., Peyk, P., Liedlgruber, M., Wilhelm, F.H., ANSLAB: Integrated multichannel peripheral biosignal processing in psychophysiological science (2016) Behav. Res. Methods, 48, pp. 1528-1545. , [CrossRef]; Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., Schoffelen, J.-M., FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data (2011) Comput. Intell. Neurosci, 2011, p. 156869. , [CrossRef]; Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., Schoffelen, J.M., Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain (2013) PLoS Biol, 11, p. e1001752; (2018), https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software, IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 26; IBM: Armonk, NY, USA, (accessed on 11 November 2020); Legendre, G., Andrillon, T., Koroma, M., Kouider, S., Sleepers track informative speech in a multitalker environment (2019) Nat. Hum. Behav, 3, pp. 274-283. , [CrossRef] [PubMed]
PY - 2020/11/11
Y1 - 2020/11/11
N2 - In our pilot study, we exposed third-trimester fetuses, from week 34 of gestation onwards, twice daily to a maternal spoken nursery rhyme. Two and five weeks after birth, 34 newborns, who were either familiarized with rhyme stimulation in utero or stimulation naïve, were (re-)exposed to the familiar, as well as to a novel and unfamiliar, rhyme, both spoken with the maternal and an unfamiliar female voice. For the stimulation-naïve group, both rhymes were unfamiliar. During stimulus presentation, heart rate activity and high-density electroencephalography were collected and newborns’ responses during familiar and unfamiliar stimulation were analyzed. All newborns demonstrated stronger speech–brain coupling at 1 Hz during the presentation of the maternal voice vs. the unfamiliar female voice. Rhyme familiarity originating from prenatal exposure had no effect on speech–brain coupling in experimentally stimulated newborns. Furthermore, only stimulation-naïve newborns demonstrated an increase in heart rate during the presentation of the unfamiliar female voice. The results indicate prenatal familiarization to auditory speech and point to the specific significance of the maternal voice already in two-to five-week-old newborns.
AB - In our pilot study, we exposed third-trimester fetuses, from week 34 of gestation onwards, twice daily to a maternal spoken nursery rhyme. Two and five weeks after birth, 34 newborns, who were either familiarized with rhyme stimulation in utero or stimulation naïve, were (re-)exposed to the familiar, as well as to a novel and unfamiliar, rhyme, both spoken with the maternal and an unfamiliar female voice. For the stimulation-naïve group, both rhymes were unfamiliar. During stimulus presentation, heart rate activity and high-density electroencephalography were collected and newborns’ responses during familiar and unfamiliar stimulation were analyzed. All newborns demonstrated stronger speech–brain coupling at 1 Hz during the presentation of the maternal voice vs. the unfamiliar female voice. Rhyme familiarity originating from prenatal exposure had no effect on speech–brain coupling in experimentally stimulated newborns. Furthermore, only stimulation-naïve newborns demonstrated an increase in heart rate during the presentation of the unfamiliar female voice. The results indicate prenatal familiarization to auditory speech and point to the specific significance of the maternal voice already in two-to five-week-old newborns.
KW - EEG
KW - Fetal learning
KW - Fetus
KW - Heart rate
KW - Maternal voice
KW - Newborn
KW - Perinatal memory
KW - Speech–brain coupling
KW - article
KW - clinical article
KW - controlled study
KW - electroencephalogram
KW - electroencephalography
KW - female
KW - heart rate
KW - human
KW - human experiment
KW - learning
KW - memory
KW - nerve potential
KW - newborn
KW - prenatal exposure
KW - speech
KW - voice
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/bf1aeb9d-7bf2-3c85-a5b1-e7abc4aebe24/
U2 - 10.3390/brainsci10110837
DO - 10.3390/brainsci10110837
M3 - Article
C2 - 33187287
SN - 2076-3425
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Brain Sci.
JF - Brain Sci.
IS - 11
ER -