TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of glenoid implant depth on the bone–polymethylmethacrylate interface
AU - Pomwenger, W.
AU - Entacher, K.
AU - Resch, H.
AU - Schuller‑Götzburg, P.
N1 - Cited By :1
Export Date: 14 December 2023
Correspondence Address: Pomwenger, W.; Departement of Information Technology & Systems Management, Urstein Süd 1, Austria; email: [email protected]
Funding details: L526-B05
Funding details: Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, PMU, R‑09/03/003-SCH
Funding text 1: This study was supported by the Austrian FWF Translational Research Program L526-B05 and the PMU-FFF Rise Project R‑09/03/003-SCH. None of the funding agencies were involved in data collection, data analysis or preparation of the manuscript.
References: Bartelt, R., Sperling, J.W., Schleck, C.D., Cofield, R.H., Shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty-five years or younger with osteoarthritis (2011) J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 20 (1), pp. 123-130; Fox, T.J., Cil, A., Sperling, J.W., Sanchez-Sotelo, J., Schleck, C.D., Cofield, R.H., Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty (2009) J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 18 (6), pp. 859-863; Kasten, P., Pape, G., Raiss, P., Bruckner, T., Rickert, M., Zeifang, F., Loew, M., Mid-term survivorship analysis of a shoulder replacement with a keeled glenoid and a modern cementing technique (2010) J Bone Joint Surg Br, 92 (3), pp. 387-392. , COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c7ksVaqsA%3D%3D; Walch, G., Young, A.A., Melis, B., Gzaielly, D., Loew, M., Boileau, P., Results of a convex-319 back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a 320 follow-up greater than 5 years (2011) J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 20 (3), pp. 385-394; Bohsali, K.I., Wirth, M.A., Rockwood, C.A., Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty (2006) J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88 (10), pp. 2279-2292. , PID: 17015609; Suárez, D.R., van der Linden, J.C., Valstar, E.R., Broomans, P., Poort, G., Rozing, P.M., van Keulen, F., Influence of the positioning of a cementless glenoid prosthesis on its interface micromotions (2009) Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. J. Eng. Med., 223 (7), pp. 795-804; Nyffeler, R.W., Sheikh, R., Atkinson, T.S., Jacob, H.A.C., Favre, P., Gerber, C., Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study (2006) J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 15 (5), pp. 625-629; Terrier, A., Büchler, P., Farron, A., Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness (2005) Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 20 (7), pp. 710-717; Frich, L.H., Jensen, N.C., Odgaard, A., Pedersen, C.M., Søjbjerg, J.O., Dalstra, M., Bone strength and material properties of the glenoid (1997) J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 6 (2), pp. 97-104. , COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ovFyisw%3D%3D; Ibarra, C., Dines, D.M., McLaughlin, J.A., Glenoid replacement in total shoulder arthroplasty (1998) Orthop Clin North Am, 29 (3), pp. 403-413. , COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK1czntFGktA%3D%3D; Seebauer, L., Ekelung, A.L., Management of glenoid bone loss in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (2017) Obere Extremität, 12 (1), pp. 6-15; Bishop, J.L., Kline, S.K., Aalderink, K.J., Zauel, R., Bey, M.J., Glenoid inclination: in vivo measures in rotator cuff tear patients and associations with superior glenohumeral joint translation (2009) J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 18 (2), pp. 231-236; Terrier, A., Büchler, P., Farron, A., Influence of glenohumeral conformity on glenoid stresses after total shoulder arthroplasty (2006) J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 15 (4), pp. 515-520; Carter, D.R., Hayes, W.C., The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure (1977) J Bone Joint Surg Am, 59 (7), pp. 954-962. , COI: 1:STN:280:DyaE1c%2FgsFKjsw%3D%3D; Hvid, I., Bentzen, S.M., Linde, F., Mosekilde, L., Pongsoipetch, B., X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens (1989) J Biomech, 22 (8-9), pp. 837-844. , COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7jtVGhsQ%3D%3D; Rice, J.C., Cowin, S.C., Bowman, J.A., On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density (1988) J Biomech, 21 (2), pp. 155-168. , COI: 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7mvFKnsA%3D%3D; Schaffler, M.B., Burr, D.B., Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density (1988) J Biomech, 21 (1), pp. 13-16. , COI: 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7hsFChtA%3D%3D; Gupta, S., Prosenjit, D., Bone geometry and mechanical properties of the human scapula using computed tomography data (2004) Trends Biomater Artif Organs, 17 (2), pp. 61-70; Guo, B., Babuška, I., The h-p version of the finite element method. Part 1. Basic approximation results (1986) Comput Mech, 55, pp. 21-41; van der Helm, F.C., Analysis of the kinematic and dynamic behavior of the shoulder mechanism (1994) J Biomech, 27 (5), pp. 527-550; Bergmann, G., Graichen, F., Bender, A., Kääb, M., Rohlmann, A., Westerhoff, P., In vivo glenohumeral contact forces—measurements in the first patient 7 months postoperatively (2007) J Biomech, 40 (10), pp. 2139-2149. , COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2szotlKmtw%3D%3D; Hopkins, A.R., Hansen, U.N., Amis, A.A., Taylor, M., Emery, R.J., Glenohumeral kinematics following total shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element investigation (2007) J Orthop Res, 25 (1), pp. 108-125; Walker, P.S., (1977) Human joints and their artificial replacement, , 1, Thomas, Springfield; Ramaniraka, N.A., Rakotomanana, L.R., Leyvraz, P.F., The fixation of the cemented femoral component. Effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface (2000) J Bone Joint Surg Br, 82 (2), pp. 297-303. , COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3hs1ahsg%3D%3D; Terrier, A., Merlini, F., Pioletti, D.P., Farron, A., Total shoulder arthroplasty: downward inclination of the glenoid component to balance supraspinatus deficiency (2009) J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 18 (3), pp. 360-365; Büchler, P., Farron, A., Benefits of an anatomical reconstruction of the humeral head during shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element analysis (2004) Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 19 (1), pp. 16-23; Gillespie, R., Lyons, R., Lazarus, M., Eccentric reaming in total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study (2009) Orthopedics, 32 (1), p. 21; Lazarus, M.D., Jensen, K.L., Southworth, C., Matsen, F.A., 3rd, The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion (2002) J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84-A (7), pp. 1174-1182; Walch, G., Young, A.A., Boileau, P., Loew, M., Gazielly, D., Molé, D., Patterns of loosening of polyethylene keeled glenoid components after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up (2012) J Bone Joint Surg Am, 94 (2), pp. 145-150; Frich, L.H., Odgaard, A., Dalstra, M., Glenoid bone architecture (1998) J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 7 (4), pp. 356-361. , COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvisFahtQ%3D%3D; Kurtz, S.M., Villarraga, M.L., Zhao, K., Edidin, A.A., Static and fatigue mechanical behavior of bone cement with elevated barium sulfate content for treatment of vertebral compression fractures (2005) Biomaterials, 26 (17), pp. 3699-3712. , COI: 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFejsrjK; Jasty, M., Bragdon, C., Burke, D., O’Connor, D., Lowenstein, J., Harris, W.H., In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions (1997) J Bone Joint Surg Am, 79 (5), pp. 707-714. , COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK2szgsVGrsg%3D%3D; Stadelmann, V.A., Terrier, A., Pioletti, D.P., Microstimulation at the bone-implant interface upregulates osteoclast activation pathways (2008) Bone, 42 (2), pp. 358-364
PY - 2019/3/14
Y1 - 2019/3/14
N2 - Purpose: Preservation of glenoid bone stock in shoulder arthroplasty is a general surgical guideline. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of implant depth on the mechanical behaviour of the bone–cement interface, in order to confirm the general assumption of maximum bone stock preservation. Materials and methods: A three-dimensional (3D) model of a scapula was derived from CT scans. Various implant depths (from 0 to 2.0 mm) were modelled using a 3D reaming procedure. Through integration of bone density into the simulation model, a finite element analysis with best-possible patient specificity was conducted. Results: The results show that mostly subchondral bone was removed during the reaming procedure for implant depths between 0.0 and 0.5 mm, whereas mostly cortical bone at the glenoid rim was removed between 0.5 and 2.0 mm. In all simulated load cases, the mean and maximum von Mises stresses as well as tensile and compressive stress within bone cement increased steadily with increasing implant depth. Conclusion: Implant depth has a substantial influence on stress distributions within bone cement. The fatigue stress of bone cement is more likely to be exceeded at higher implant depths, and higher micromotions could contribute to bone resorption and early implant failure in the long term.
AB - Purpose: Preservation of glenoid bone stock in shoulder arthroplasty is a general surgical guideline. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of implant depth on the mechanical behaviour of the bone–cement interface, in order to confirm the general assumption of maximum bone stock preservation. Materials and methods: A three-dimensional (3D) model of a scapula was derived from CT scans. Various implant depths (from 0 to 2.0 mm) were modelled using a 3D reaming procedure. Through integration of bone density into the simulation model, a finite element analysis with best-possible patient specificity was conducted. Results: The results show that mostly subchondral bone was removed during the reaming procedure for implant depths between 0.0 and 0.5 mm, whereas mostly cortical bone at the glenoid rim was removed between 0.5 and 2.0 mm. In all simulated load cases, the mean and maximum von Mises stresses as well as tensile and compressive stress within bone cement increased steadily with increasing implant depth. Conclusion: Implant depth has a substantial influence on stress distributions within bone cement. The fatigue stress of bone cement is more likely to be exceeded at higher implant depths, and higher micromotions could contribute to bone resorption and early implant failure in the long term.
KW - Arthroplasty, shoulder
KW - Finite element analysis
KW - Glenoid
KW - Implant depth
KW - Scapula
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/041f661a-e92e-3543-a26d-56aff64b5dfa/
U2 - 10.1007/s11678-019-0512-6
DO - 10.1007/s11678-019-0512-6
M3 - Article
SN - 1862-6599
VL - 14
SP - 284
EP - 291
JO - Obere Extremitat
JF - Obere Extremitat
IS - 4
ER -