Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 9473-9491 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Remote Sensing |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Classification
- Graph database
- Neo4j
- Ontology
- Remote sensing
- Aerial photography
- Classification (of information)
- Data handling
- Database systems
- Graphic methods
- Airborne Laser scanning
- Automated classification
- Computational operations
- Computational performance
- Manual classification
- Very high resolution
- Image classification
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the Computational Performance of Ontology-Based Classification Using Graph Databases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Remote Sensing, Vol. 7, No. 7, 2015, p. 9473-9491.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving the Computational Performance of Ontology-Based Classification Using Graph Databases
AU - Lampoltshammer, T.J.
AU - Wiegand, S.
N1 - Cited By :14 Export Date: 14 December 2023 Correspondence Address: Lampoltshammer, T.J.; School of Information Technology and Systems Management, Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Urstein Süd 1, Austria References: Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Description logics as ontology languages for the semantic web (2005) Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning, pp. 228-248. , Springer: Berlin, Germany; Bock, J., Haase, P., Ji, Q., Volz, R., Benchmarking OWL Reasoners, , http://ai.ia.agh.edu.pl/wiki/_media/pl:dydaktyka:miw:2010:dltls:prezentacja:testowanie_reasonerow.pdf, (accessed on 31 March 2015); Li, Y., Yu, Y., Heflin, J., Evaluating Reasoners under Realistic Semantic Web Conditions (2012) Proceedings of the OWL Reasoner Evaluation Workshop (ORE 2012), , Manchester, UK, 1 July; Lampoltshammer, T.J., Heistracher, T., Ontology evaluation with Protégé using OWLET (2014) Infocommun. J, 6, pp. 12-17; Weithöner, T., Liebig, T., Luther, M., Böhm, S., What's wrong with OWL benchmarks (2006) Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Scalable Semantic Web Knowledge Base Systems (SSWS 2006), pp. 101-114. , Athens, GA, USA, 5-6 November; Horrocks, I., Li, L., Turi, D., Bechhofer, S., The instance store: DL reasoning with large numbers of individuals (2004) Proceedings of the 2004 Description Logic Workshop (DL 2004), pp. 31-40. , Whistler, BC, Canada, 6-8 June; Angles, R., Gutierrez, C., Survey of graph database models (2008) ACM Comput. Surv, 40, pp. 1-39; Blaschke, T., Object based image analysis for remote sensing (2010) ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens, 65, pp. 2-16; Hay, G.J., Castilla, G., Wulder, M.A., Ruiz, J.R., An automated object-based approach for the multiscale image segmentation of forest scenes (2005) Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf, 7, pp. 339-359; Gruber, T.R., A translation approach to portable ontology specifications (1993) J. Knowl. Acquis, 5, pp. 199-220; Gruber, T.R., Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? (1995) Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud, 43, pp. 907-928; Daconta, M.C., Smith, K.T., Oerst, L.J., The semantic web: A guide to the future of XML, web services, and knowledge management (2004) Comput. Rev, 45, pp. 778-779; Motik, B., Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Wu, Z., Fokoue, A., Lutz, C., Owl 2 web ontology language: Profiles (2009) W3C Recomm, 27, p. 61; Schmiedel, A., Semantic Indexing Based on Description Logics, , http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-1/schmiedel-long.pdf, (accessed on 31 March 2015); De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., TBox and ABox Reasoning in Expressive Description Logics, , http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/1996/WS-96-05/WS96-05-004.pdf, (accessed on 31 March 2015); Durand, N., Derivaux, S., Forestier, G., Wemmert, C., Gançarski, P., Boussaid, O., Puissant, A., Ontology-based object recognition for remote sensing image interpretation (2007) Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2007), pp. 472-479. , Patras, Greece, 29-31 October; Belgiu, M., Lampoltshammer, T., Hofer, B., An extension of an ontology-based land cover designation approach for fuzzy rules (2013) GI_Forum 2013. Creating the GISociety, pp. 59-70. , Car, A., Jekel, T., Strobl, J., Eds.; Austrian Academy of Sciences Press: Vienna, Austria; Belgiu, M., Tomljenovic, I., Lampoltshammer, T.J., Blaschke, T., Höfle, B., Ontology-based classification of building types detected from airborne laser scanning data (2014) Remote Sens, 6, pp. 1347-1366; Hofmann, P., Lettmayer, P., Blaschke, T., Belgiu, M., Wegenkittl, S., Graf, R., Lampoltshammer, T.J., Andrejchenko, V., ABIA-A conceptional framework for agent based image analysis (2014) South East. Eur. J. Earth Obs. Geomat, 3, pp. 125-130; Hofmann, P., Lettmayer, P., Blaschke, T., Belgiu, M., Wegenkittl, S., Graf, R., Lampoltshammer, T.J., Andrejchenko, V., Towards a framework for agent-based image analysis of remote-sensing data (2015) Int. J. Image Data Fusion, 6, pp. 115-137; Goldberg, A.V., Harrelson, C., Computing the shortest path: A search meets graph theory (2005) Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 156-165. , Philadelphia, PA, USA, 23-25 January; Manola, F., Miller, E., McBride, B., RDF Primer, , http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer, (accessed on 31 March 2015); Prud'Hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A., SPARQL Query Language for RDF, , http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/, (accessed on 31 March 2015); Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C., Semantics and complexity of SPARQL (2006) Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 30-43. , Athens, GA, USA, 5-9 November; http://neo4j.com/, (accessed on 31 March 2015); http://www.ontotext.com/products/ontotext-graphdb/, (accessed on 31 March 2015); http://rdf4j.org, (accessed on 31 March 2015); http://www.orientechnologies.com/orientdb/, (accessed on 31 March 2015); AlegroGraph, , http://franz.com/agraph/allegrograph/, (accessed on 31 March 2015); Deville, Y., Gilbert, D., van Helden, J., Wodak, S.J., An overview of data models for the analysis of biochemical pathways (2003) Brief. Bioinform, 4, pp. 246-259; Olken, F., Tutorial on graph data management for biology. [Tutorial Hand-out], , https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Olken2/publication/242497760_Graph_Data_Management_For_Biology/links/02e7e52a21e337ad52000000.pdf, (accessed on 21 July 2015); Brandes, U., Erlebach, T., (2005) Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations, , Springer Science & Business Media: Medford, MA, USA; Miller, J.J., Graph database applications and concepts with Neo4j (2013) Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference, , Atlanta, GA, USA, 23-24 March; Lampoltshammer, T.J., Sageder, C., Heistracher, T., The openlaws platform-An open architecture for big open legal data (2015) Proceedings of the 18th International Legal Informatics Symposium IRIS 2015, , Salzburg, Austria, 26-28 February; Karamizadeh, S., Abdullah, S.M., Zamani, M., Kherikhah, A., Pattern recognition techniques: studies on appropriate classifications (2015) Advanced Computer and Communication Engineering Technology, 315, pp. 791-799. , Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland; http://www2.qgis.org/en/site/, (accessed on 31 March 2015); Weidner, U., Contribution to the assessment of segmentation quality for remote sensing applications (2008) Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci, 37, pp. 479-484; Fielding, R.T., (2000) Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures, , Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA; Battle, R., Benson, E., Bridging the semantic Web and Web 2.0 with representational state transfer (REST) (2008) J. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web, 6, pp. 61-69; Jordan, G., (2014) Practical Neo4j, , Apress: New York, NY, USA; Xu, X., Zhang, L., Wong, T.-T., Structure-based ASCII art (2010) ACM Trans. Graph, 29; Korf, R.E., Depth-first iterative-deepening: An optimal admissible tree search (1985) Artif. Intell, 27, pp. 97-109; http://jena.apache.Org, (accessed on 20 March 2014); Haarslev, V., Möller, R., Racer: An OWL Reasoning Agent for the Semantic Web, , http://www1.racer-systems.com/technology/contributions/2003/HaMo03d.pdf, (accessed on 31 March 2015); Metke-Jimenez, A., Lawley, M., Snorocket 2.0: Concrete Domains and Concurrent Classification, , http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1015/paper_3.pdf, (accessed on 31 March 2015); Kazakov, Y., Krötzsch, M., Simancík, F., The incredible ELK (2014) J. Autom. Reason, 53, pp. 1-61; Pan, J.Z., Ren, Y., Jekjantuk, N., Garcia, J., Reasoning the FMA Ontologies with TrOWL, , http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1015/paper_18.pdf, (accessed on 31 March 2015); Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y., Pellet: A practical owl-dl reasoner (2007) Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web, 5, pp. 51-53; Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I., FaCT++ description logic reasoner: system description (2006) Automated Reasoning, 4130, pp. 292-297. , Furbach, U., Shankar, N., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; Glimm, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Stoilos, G., Wang, Z., HermiT: An OWL 2 reasoner (2014) J. Autom. Reason, 53, pp. 245-269; Borgida, A., Brachman, R.J., Loading data into description reasoners (1993) ACM SIGMOD Rec, 22, pp. 217-226; Jonassen, D.H., Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? (1991) Educ. Technol. Res. Dev, 39, pp. 5-14; Kuhn, W., Semantic engineering (2009) Research Trends in Geographic Information Science, pp. 63-76. , Springer: Berlin, Germany; Rossmann, J., Schluse, R., Waspe, R., Moshammer, R., Simulation in the woods: From remote sensing based data acquisition and processing to various simulation applications (2011) Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), pp. 984-996. , Phoenix, AZ, USA, 11-14 December; Hullo, J.F., Thibault, G., Boucheny, C., Advances in multi-sensor scanning and visualization of complex plants: The utmost case of a reactor building (2015) Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci, 40, pp. 163-169; Maciel, M., Silva, M., Escada, M., Mining frequent substructures from deforestation objects (2012) IGARSS; Cai, Z., Zhong, S., Jiang, W., Lei, M., A schema of ecological environment sensitivity evaluation based on GIS (2011) Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Multimedia Technology (ICMT), pp. 6745-6748. , Hangzhou, China, 26-28 July
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The increasing availability of very high-resolution remote sensing imagery (i.e., from satellites, airborne laser scanning, or aerial photography) represents both a blessing and a curse for researchers. The manual classification of these images, or other similar geo-sensor data, is time-consuming and leads to subjective and non-deterministic results. Due to this fact, (semi-) automated classification approaches are in high demand in affected research areas. Ontologies provide a proper way of automated classification for various kinds of sensor data, including remotely sensed data. However, the processing of data entities-so-called individuals-is one of the most cost-intensive computational operations within ontology reasoning. Therefore, an approach based on graph databases is proposed to overcome the issue of a high time consumption regarding the classification task. The introduced approach shifts the classification task from the classical Protégé environment and its common reasoners to the proposed graph-based approaches. For the validation, the authors tested the approach on a simulation scenario based on a real-world example. The results demonstrate a quite promising improvement of classification speed-up to 80,000 times faster than the Protégé-based approach. © 2015 by the authors.
AB - The increasing availability of very high-resolution remote sensing imagery (i.e., from satellites, airborne laser scanning, or aerial photography) represents both a blessing and a curse for researchers. The manual classification of these images, or other similar geo-sensor data, is time-consuming and leads to subjective and non-deterministic results. Due to this fact, (semi-) automated classification approaches are in high demand in affected research areas. Ontologies provide a proper way of automated classification for various kinds of sensor data, including remotely sensed data. However, the processing of data entities-so-called individuals-is one of the most cost-intensive computational operations within ontology reasoning. Therefore, an approach based on graph databases is proposed to overcome the issue of a high time consumption regarding the classification task. The introduced approach shifts the classification task from the classical Protégé environment and its common reasoners to the proposed graph-based approaches. For the validation, the authors tested the approach on a simulation scenario based on a real-world example. The results demonstrate a quite promising improvement of classification speed-up to 80,000 times faster than the Protégé-based approach. © 2015 by the authors.
KW - Classification
KW - Graph database
KW - Neo4j
KW - Ontology
KW - Remote sensing
KW - Aerial photography
KW - Classification (of information)
KW - Data handling
KW - Database systems
KW - Graphic methods
KW - Airborne Laser scanning
KW - Automated classification
KW - Computational operations
KW - Computational performance
KW - Manual classification
KW - Very high resolution
KW - Image classification
U2 - 10.3390/rs70709473
DO - 10.3390/rs70709473
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-4292
VL - 7
SP - 9473
EP - 9491
JO - Remote Sensing
JF - Remote Sensing
IS - 7
ER -