Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Sustainability |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Feb 2019 |
Keywords
- Digital platforms
- Digital transformation
- Industrial internet of things
- Industry 4.0
- Qualitative-empirical study
- Small and medium-sized enterprises
- industrial enterprise
- Internet
- manufacturing
- qualitative analysis
- questionnaire survey
- Australia
- Germany
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Antecedents to Digital Platform Usage in Industry 4.0 by Established Manufacturers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 4, 20.02.2019.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Antecedents to Digital Platform Usage in Industry 4.0 by Established Manufacturers
AU - Müller, J.M.
N1 - Cited By :35 Export Date: 14 December 2023 Correspondence Address: Müller, J.M.; Department of Logistics and Operations Management, Austria; email: [email protected] References: Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J., (2013) Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0-Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, , https://www.acatech.de/Publikation/recommendations-for-implementing-the-strategic-initiativeindustrie-4-0-final-report-of-the-industrie-4-0-working-group/, Communication Promoters Group of the Industry-Science Research Alliance, acatech: Frankfurt am Main, Germany (accessed on 20 February 2019); Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M., Industry 4.0 (2014) Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng, 6, pp. 239-242; Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Arnold, C., Voigt, K.I., Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits and Challenges of Industry 4.0 (2017) Int. J. Innov. Manag, 21; Kenney, M., Zysman, J., The Rise of the Platform Economy (2016) Issues Sci. Technol, 32, pp. 61-69; Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A., Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation (2014) J. Prod. Innovat. Manag, 31, pp. 417-433; Hagiu, A., Wright, J., Multi-Sided Platforms (2015) Int. J. Ind. Organ, 43, pp. 162-174; Müller, J.M., Buliga, O., Voigt, K.I., Fortune Favors the Prepared: How SMEs Approach Business Model Innovations in Industry 4.0 (2018) Technol. Forecast. Soc, 132, pp. 2-17; Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., Choudary, S.P., (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You, , Norton and Company: New York, NY, USA; Wiegand, N., Witt, S., Steiner, M., Backhaus, K., Platform Adoption in Network Markets: Selecting Beneficial Partners to Achieve Market Dominance (2015) Int. J. Innov. Manag, 19; Müller, J.M., Pommeranz, B., Weisser, J., Voigt, K.I., Digital, Social Media, and Mobile Marketing in industrial buying: Still in need of customer segmentation? Empirical evidence from Poland and Germany (2018) Ind. Mark. Manag, 73, pp. 70-83; Boudreau, K., Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs (2010) Devolving Control. Manag. Sci, 56, pp. 1849-1872; De Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., Basole, R.C., The Digital Platform: A Research Agenda (2017) J. Inf. Technol, pp. 1-12; Gawer, A., Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework (2014) Res. Policy, 43, pp. 1239-1249; McIntyre, D.P., Srinivasan, A., Networks, Platforms, and Strategy: Emerging Views And Next Steps (2017) Strateg. Manag. J, 38, pp. 141-160; Schuh, G., Potente, T., Wesch-Potente, C., Weber, A.R., Prote, J.P., Collaboration Mechanisms to Increase Productivity in the Context of Industrie 4.0 (2014) Procedia CIRP, 19, pp. 51-56; Veza, M., Mladineo, M., Gjeldum, N., Managing Innovative Production Network of Smart Factories (2015) IFAC-Papers OnLine, 48, pp. 555-560; Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.A., A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems (2015) Manuf. Lett, 3, pp. 18-23; Schlechtendahl, J., Keinert, M., Kretschmer, F., Lechler, A., Verl, A., Making Existing Production Systems Industry 4.0-Ready (2015) Prod. Eng, 9, pp. 143-148; Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.A., Recent Advances and Trends in Predictive Manufacturing Systems in Big Data Environment (2013) Manuf. Lett, 1, pp. 38-41; Davis, J., Edgar, T., Porter, J., Bernaden, J., Sarli, M., Smart Manufacturing, Manufacturing Intelligence and Demand-Dynamic Performance (2012) Comput. Chem. Eng, 47, pp. 145-156; Radziwon, A., Bilberg, A., Bogers, M., Madsen, E.S., The Smart Factory: Exploring Adaptive and Flexible Manufacturing Solutions (2014) Procedia Eng, 69, pp. 1184-1190; Wang, F., Zhao, J., Chi, M., Li, Y., Collaborative Innovation Capability in IT-Enabled Inter-Firm Collaboration (2017) Ind. Manag. Data Syst, 117, pp. 2364-2380; Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., Gatti, C., Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review (2018) Sustainability, 10, p. 3821; Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., De Freitas Rocha Loures, F., Pierin Ramos, L.F., Past, Present and Future of Industry 4.0-A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda Proposal (2017) Int. J. Prod. Res, 55, pp. 3609-3629; Müller, J., Dotzauer, V., Voigt, K.-I., Industry 4.0 and its Impact on Reshoring Decisions of German Manufacturing Enterprises (2017) Supply Management Research: Aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse 2017, pp. 165-179. , Bode, C., Bogaschewsky, R., Eßig, M., Lasch, R., Stölzle, W., Eds.; Springer Gabler: Wiesbaden, Germany; Müller, J.M., Voigt, K.-I., Sustainable Industrial Value Creation in SMEs: A Comparison between Industry 4.0 and Made in China 2025 (2018) Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol, 5, pp. 659-670; Kang, H.S., Lee, J.Y., Choi, S., Kim, H., Park, J.H., Son, J.Y., Smart Manufacturing: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions (2016) Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol, 3, pp. 111-128; Müller, J.M., Kiel, D., Voigt, K.I., What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability (2018) Sustainability, 10, p. 247; Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., Rosenberg, M., How Virtualization, Decentralization and Network Building Change the Manufacturing Landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective (2014) Int. J. Mec. Aero Ind. Mech. Eng, 8, pp. 37-44; Laudien, S.M., Daxböck, B., The Influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on Business Model Design: A Qualitative-Empirical Analysis (2016) Int. J. Innov. Manag, 20; Arnold, C., Kiel, D., Voigt, K.I., How the Industrial Internet of Things Changes Business Models in Different Manufacturing Industries (2016) Int. J. Innov. Manag, 20; Schallmo, D., Williams, C.A., Boardman, L., Digital Transformation Of Business Models-Best Practice, Enablers, And Roadmap (2017) Int. J. Innov. Manag, 21; Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M.W., Strategies for Two-Sided Markets (2006) Harv. Bus. Rev, 84, p. 92; Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Grover, V., Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Innovating with Enterprise Systems and Digital Platforms: A Contingent Resource-Based Theory View (2016) Inform. Manag, 53, pp. 366-379; Xie, K., Wu, Y., Xiao, J., Hu, Q., Value Co-Creation between Firms and Customers: The Role of Big Data-Based Cooperative Assets (2016) Inform. Manag, 53, pp. 1034-1048; Esposito De Falco, S., Renzi, A., Orlando, B., Cucari, N., Open Collaborative Innovation and Digital Platforms (2017) Prod. Plan. Control, 28, pp. 1344-1353; Inoue, Y., Tsujimoto, M., Genres of Complementary Products in Platform-Based Markets: Changes in Evolutionary Mechanisms by Platform Diffusion Strategies (2018) Int. J. Innov. Manag, 22; Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A., (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation, , Harvard Business School: Boston, MA, USA; Tiwana, A., Bush, A.A., Spotting Lemons in Platform Markets: A Conjoint Experiment on Signaling (2014) IEEE T. Eng. Manag, 61, pp. 393-405; Ravichandran, T., Exploring the Relationships Between IT Competence, Innovation Capacity and Organizational Agility (2017) J. Strateg. Inf. Syst, 27, pp. 22-42; Fatorachian, H., Kazemi, H., A Critical Investigation of Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing: Theoretical Operationalisation Framework (2018) Prod. Plan. Control, pp. 1-12; Kiel, D., Arnold, C., Voigt, K.I., The Influence of the Industrial Internet of Things on Business Models of Established Manufacturing Companies-A Business Level Perspective (2017) Technovation, 68, pp. 4-19; Martinez, B., Vilajosana, X., Kim, I.H., Zhou, J., Tuset-Peiró, P., Xhafa, A., Poissonnier, D., Lu, X., I3Mote: An open development platform for the intelligent industrial internet (2017) Sensors, 17, p. 986; Menon, K., Kärkkäinen, H., Wuest, T., Gupta, J.P., Industrial internet platforms: A conceptual evaluation from a product lifecycle management perspective (2018) Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf; Silva, M., Vieira, E., Signoretti, G., Silva, I., Silva, D., Ferrari, P., A Customer Feedback Platform for Vehicle Manufacturing Compliant with Industry 4.0 Vision (2018) Sensors, 18, p. 3298; Alexopoulos, K., Sipsas, K., Xanthakis, E., Makris, S., Mourtzis, D., An industrial Internet of things based platform for context-aware information services in manufacturing (2018) Int. J. Comp. Integ, 31, pp. 1111-1123; Edmondson, A.C., McManus, S.E., Methodological Fit in Management Field Research (2007) Acad. Manag. Rev, 32, pp. 1246-1264; Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E., Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges (2007) Acad. Manag. J, 50, pp. 25-32; Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M., The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems (1987) MIS Q, 11, pp. 369-385; Yin, R.K., (2009) Case Study Research: Design andMethods, , Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; Dubé, L., Paré, G., Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices, Trends, and Recommendations (2003) MIS Q, 27, pp. 597-636; Mason, J., (2002) Qualitative Researching, , Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; Cannell, C.F., Kahn, R.L., Interviewing (1968) The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2rd ed, pp. 525-595. , Lindzey, G., Aronson, E., Eds.; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA; Kasabov, E., Start-Up Difficulties in Early-Stage Peripheral Clusters: The Case of IT in an Emerging Economy (2015) Entrep. Theory Pract, 39, pp. 727-761; Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A., (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, , Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., Hamilton, A.L., Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology (2013) Organ. Res. Methods, 16, pp. 15-31; Graebner, M.E., Eisenhardt, K.M., The Seller's Side of the Story: Acquisition as Courtship and Governance as Syndicate in Entrepreneurial Firms (2004) Admin. Sci. Q, 49, pp. 366-403; Krippendorff, K., (2013) Content Analysis, , Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA; Maxwell, J.A., (1996) Qualitative Research Design, , Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; Weston, C., Gandell, T., Beauchamp, J., McAlpine, L., Wiseman, C., Beauchamp, C., Analyzing interview data: The development and evolution of a coding system (2001) Qual. Sociol, 24, pp. 381-400; Holsti, O.R., Content Analysis (1968) The Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 596-692. , Lindzey, G., Aronson, E., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA; Eisenhardt, K.M., Building theories from case study research (1989) Acad. Manag. J, 14, pp. 532-551; Birkel, H.S., Veile, J.W., Müller, J.M., Hartmann, E., Voigt, K.-I., Development of a risk framework for Industry 4.0 in the context of sustainability for established manufacturers (2019) Sustainability, 11, p. 384; Müller, J.M., Veile, J.W., Voigt, K.-I., Cooperation strategies among SMEs for Implementing Industry 4.0 (2017) Proc. Hamburg Int. Conf. Logist, 23, pp. 301-318; Seuring, S., Müller, M., From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management (2008) J. Clean. Prod, 16, pp. 1699-1710; Ojala, A., Evers, N., Rialp, A., Extending the international new venture phenomenon to digital platform providers: A longitudinal case study (2018) J. World Bus, 53, pp. 725-739
PY - 2019/2/20
Y1 - 2019/2/20
N2 - Digital platforms are expected to have the potential for a multitude of purposes for industrial enterprises, for instance when integrated within the concept of Industry 4.0. Despite its relevance for industrial value creation, little research on platforms in the industrial context has been undertaken so far. Owing to the lack of research in this field, the paper aims to investigate the potentials and challenges of digital platforms in order to generate an understanding of the antecedents to the use of digital platforms by established manufacturers. In the qualitative-exploratory study, the paper uses a qualitative empirical research approach, relying on in-depth expert interviews. The sample comprises interviews with managers of 102 German and Austrian industrial enterprises from several industrial sectors. All of the enterprises regarded have practical experiences with digital platforms. The results show that the main potentials of digital platforms are reducing transaction costs, combining strengths of enterprises, and realizing economies of scale as well as economies of scope. Yet, digital platforms bring challenges, such as a lack of trust, competitive thinking, high coordination efforts, and loss of confidential information. The paper further distinguishes between various industry sectors revealing interesting differences. Based on the results, the paper indicates possibilities for future research and provides corporate practice with implications.
AB - Digital platforms are expected to have the potential for a multitude of purposes for industrial enterprises, for instance when integrated within the concept of Industry 4.0. Despite its relevance for industrial value creation, little research on platforms in the industrial context has been undertaken so far. Owing to the lack of research in this field, the paper aims to investigate the potentials and challenges of digital platforms in order to generate an understanding of the antecedents to the use of digital platforms by established manufacturers. In the qualitative-exploratory study, the paper uses a qualitative empirical research approach, relying on in-depth expert interviews. The sample comprises interviews with managers of 102 German and Austrian industrial enterprises from several industrial sectors. All of the enterprises regarded have practical experiences with digital platforms. The results show that the main potentials of digital platforms are reducing transaction costs, combining strengths of enterprises, and realizing economies of scale as well as economies of scope. Yet, digital platforms bring challenges, such as a lack of trust, competitive thinking, high coordination efforts, and loss of confidential information. The paper further distinguishes between various industry sectors revealing interesting differences. Based on the results, the paper indicates possibilities for future research and provides corporate practice with implications.
KW - Digital platforms
KW - Digital transformation
KW - Industrial internet of things
KW - Industry 4.0
KW - Qualitative-empirical study
KW - Small and medium-sized enterprises
KW - industrial enterprise
KW - Internet
KW - manufacturing
KW - qualitative analysis
KW - questionnaire survey
KW - Australia
KW - Germany
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0efb2543-408f-3d06-8d3e-8da220535d4c/
U2 - 10.3390/su11041121
DO - 10.3390/su11041121
M3 - Article
SN - 2071-1050
VL - 11
JO - Sustainability
JF - Sustainability
IS - 4
ER -