TY - JOUR
T1 - A digital readiness check for the evaluation of supply chain aspects and company size for Industry 4.0
AU - Lassnig, M.
AU - Müller, J.M.
AU - Klieber, K.
AU - Zeisler, A.
AU - Schirl, M.
N1 - Cited By :26
Export Date: 14 December 2023
Correspondence Address: Lassnig, M.; Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbHAustria; email: [email protected]
Funding details: Interreg
Funding details: European Commission, EC
Funding text 1: The DRC represents a project funded by the European Union in the German–Austrian border region between Bavaria and Salzburg. It assesses the development stage towards DT/Industry 4.0 with a focus on SC aspects and a differentiation between SMEs and large enterprises. These three characteristics, (1) developing a readiness check, (2) extending the focus to the SC and (3) comparing SMEs and large enterprises, were clear targets, which were successfully approved by the funding agency. Therefore, a broader investigation, for example, across Austria, is intended by public agencies in the next years. Further, the DRC shall help companies to benchmark their own position and give them hints in which regards they might be lagging behind.
Funding text 2: This study has been partly financed by the programme “Interreg Austria-Bavaria 2014-2020”.
References: Amaral, A., Peças, P., SMEs and Industry 4.0: two case studies of digitalization for a smoother integration (2021) Computers in Industry, 125. , 103333; (2017) Supply chain operations reference model, version 12.0, , https://apics.org/scor, accessed, 4 June 2020; Birkel, H.S., Müller, J.M., Potentials of industry 4.0 for supply chain management within the triple bottom line of sustainability – a systematic literature review (2021) Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 125612; Chen, C.L., Cross-disciplinary innovations by Taiwanese manufacturing SMEs in the context of Industry 4.0 (2020) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31 (6), pp. 1145-1168; Chonsawat, N., Sopadang, A., Defining SMEs' 4.0 readiness indicators (2020) Applied Sciences, 10 (24), p. 8998; Cimini, C., Boffelli, A., Lagorio, A., Kalchschmidt, M., Pinto, R., How do industry 4.0 technologies influence organisational change? An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs (2020) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32 (3), pp. 695-721; Colli, M., Madsen, O., Berger, U., Møller, C., Wæhrens, B.V., Bockholt, M., Contextualizing the outcome of a maturity assessment for Industry 4.0 (2018) IFAC-PapersOnline, 51 (11), pp. 1347-1352; De Carolis, A., Macchi, M., Negri, E., Terzi, S., A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies (2017) IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, pp. 13-20. , Springer, Cham; Diamantopoulos, A., Winklhofer, H.M., Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development (2001) Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), pp. 269-277; Dutta, G., Kumar, R., Sindhwani, R., Singh, R.K., Digitalization priorities of quality control processes for SMEs: a conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0 adoption (2021) Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32, pp. 1679-1698; Felch, V., Asdecker, B., Sucky, E., Maturity models in the age of Industry 4.0 - do the available models correspond to the needs of business practice? (2019) Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, , 2019; Ghadge, A., Kara, M.E., Moradlou, H., Goswami, M., The impact of Industry 4.0 implementation on supply chains (2020) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31 (4), pp. 669-686; Ghobakhloo, M., Fathi, M., Corporate survival in Industry 4.0 era: the enabling role of lean-digitized manufacturing (2019) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31 (1), pp. 1-30; Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Digital transformation success under Industry 4.0: a strategic guideline for manufacturing SMEs (2021) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32 (8), pp. 1533-1556; Horváth, D., Szabó, R.Z., Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? (2019) Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, pp. 119-132; Huan, S.H., Sheoran, S.K., Wang, G., A review and analysis of Supply Chain operations reference (SCOR) model (2004) Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9 (1), pp. 23-29; (2020) Industrie 4.0-Readiness Online-Selbst-Check für Unternehmen, , https://www.industrie40-readiness.de/index.php, accessed, 18 September 2020; Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J., Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0: final report of the Industrie 4.0 working group (2013) Communication Promoters Group of the Industry-Science Research Alliance, , Acatech, Frankfurt am Main; Khanzode, A.G., Sarma, P.R., Mangla, S.K., Yuan, H., Modeling the industry 4.0 adoption for sustainable production in micro, small and medium enterprises (2020) Journal of Cleaner Production, , 123489; Lichtblau, K., Stich, V., Bertenrath, R., Blum, M., Bleider, M., Millack, A., Schmitt, K., Schröter, M., Industrie 4.0-readiness (2015) Aachen Köln, , https://industrie40.vdma.org/documents/4214230/26342484/Industrie_40_Readiness_Study_1529498007918.pdf, accessed, 14 January 2021; Machado, C.G., Winroth, M., Carlsson, D., Almström, P., Centerholt, V., Hallin, M., Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing companies: challenges and enablers towards increased digitalization (2019) Procedia CIRP, 81, pp. 1113-1118; Masood, T., Sonntag, P., Industry 4.0: adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs (2020) Computers in Industry, 121; Mittal, S., Khan, M.A., Romero, D., Wuest, T., A critical review of smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0 maturity models: implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2018) Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 49, pp. 194-214; Mittal, S., Khan, M.A., Purohit, J.K., Menon, K., Romero, D., Wuest, T., A smart manufacturing adoption framework for SMEs (2020) International Journal of Production Research, 58 (5), pp. 1555-1573; Moeuf, A., Lamouri, S., Pellerin, R., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., Tobon-Valencia, E., Eburdy, R., Identification of critical success factors, risks and opportunities of Industry 4.0 in SMEs (2020) International Journal of Production Research, 58 (5), pp. 1384-1400; Müller, J., Buliga, O., Voigt, K.-I., Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0 (2018) Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, pp. 2-17; Müller, J.M., Veile, J.W., Voigt, K.-I., Prerequisites and incentives for digital information sharing in Industry 4.0 - an international comparison across data types (2020) Computers and Industrial Engineering, 148, p. 106733; Müller, J.M., Buliga, O., Voigt, K.I., The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models - a comparison between SMEs and large enterprises (2021) European Management Journal, 39 (3), pp. 333-343; Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Weber, C.V., Capability maturity model, version 1.1 (1993) IEEE Software, 10 (4), pp. 18-27. , 1 October 2020; Pham, Q.T., Measuring the ICT maturity of SMEs (2010) Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 11 (1), pp. 1-14; Pirola, F., Cimini, C., Pinto, R., Digital readiness assessment of Italian SMEs: a case-study research (2019) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31 (5), pp. 1045-1083; Sahi, G.K., Gupta, M.C., Cheng, T.C.E., The effects of strategic orientation on operational ambidexterity: a study of Indian SMEs in the industry 4.0 era (2020) International Journal of Production Economics, 220; Samaranayake, P., Ramanathan, K., Laosirihongthong, T., Implementing industry 4.0: a technological readiness perspective (2017) IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, , Singapore: 10-13 December; Schmidt, M.C., Veile, J.W., Müller, J.M., Voigt, K.I., Ecosystems 4.0: redesigning global value chains (2020) International Journal of Logistics Management, 32 (4), pp. 1124-1149; Schumacher, A., Erol, S., Sihn, W., A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises (2016) Procedia CIRP, 52 (1), pp. 161-166; Somohano-Rodríguez, F.M., Madrid-Guijarro, A., López-Fernández, J.M., Does Industry 4.0 really matter for SME innovation? (2020) Journal of Small Business Management, , ahead of print ahead of print; Sriram, R.M., Vinodh, S., Analysis of readiness factors for Industry 4.0 implementation in SMEs using COPRAS (2020) International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 38 (5), pp. 1178-1192; Stentoft, J., Adsbøll Wickstrøm, K., Philipsen, K., Haug, A., Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers (2020) Production Planning and Control, 32 (10), pp. 811-828; Veile, J.W., Kiel, D., Müller, J.M., Voigt, K.-I., Lessons learned from Industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry (2019) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31 (5), pp. 977-997; Veile, J.W., Schmidt, M.C., Müller, J.M., Voigt, K.-I., Relationship follows technology! How Industry 4.0 reshapes future buyer-supplier relationships (2020) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32 (6), pp. 1245-1266; Vereycken, Y., Ramioul, M., Desiere, S., Bal, M., Human resource practices accompanying industry 4.0 in European manufacturing industry (2021) Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32 (5), pp. 1016-1036; Wagire, A.A., Joshi, R., Rathore, A.P.S., Jain, R., Development of maturity model for assessing the implementation of Industry 4.0: learning from theory and practice (2020) Production Planning and Control, , press; (2017) An industry 4 readiness assessment tool, , https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/wmg/research/scip/reports/final_version_of_i4_report_for_use_on_websites.pdf, accessed, 11 January 2021
PY - 2021/11/26
Y1 - 2021/11/26
N2 - Purpose: While there are several readiness assessments regarding digital transformation (DT) and Industry 4.0 in extant literature, this study aims to contribute to (a) a better understanding of digital readiness in supply chain (SC) aspects and (b) elaborate on differences between small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large enterprises. Design/methodology/approach: The study is based on 409 companies that participated in the Digital Readiness Check (DRC) in the region of Salzburg (Austria) and Bavaria (Germany) – an online assessment for self-evaluating the digital readiness of companies. Findings: The study's results provide insights for the categories of strategy, employees, initiation of business transactions and SC. These are further differentiated for SMEs and large enterprises. Research limitations/implications: The study is limited to two regions in Austria and Germany, based on a self-evaluation of companies in a single point of time perspective. For future research, the results of this study should be expanded for different regions. Further, the results could be validated regarding external observations and measuring results at a later point of time. Practical implications: The DRC may help companies in benchmarking themselves and gaining a better understanding about categories that must be improved, especially regarding SC aspects of DT. Originality/value: The DRC extends extant literature regarding the differentiation between SMEs and large enterprises as well as focussing on SC aspects of DT.
AB - Purpose: While there are several readiness assessments regarding digital transformation (DT) and Industry 4.0 in extant literature, this study aims to contribute to (a) a better understanding of digital readiness in supply chain (SC) aspects and (b) elaborate on differences between small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large enterprises. Design/methodology/approach: The study is based on 409 companies that participated in the Digital Readiness Check (DRC) in the region of Salzburg (Austria) and Bavaria (Germany) – an online assessment for self-evaluating the digital readiness of companies. Findings: The study's results provide insights for the categories of strategy, employees, initiation of business transactions and SC. These are further differentiated for SMEs and large enterprises. Research limitations/implications: The study is limited to two regions in Austria and Germany, based on a self-evaluation of companies in a single point of time perspective. For future research, the results of this study should be expanded for different regions. Further, the results could be validated regarding external observations and measuring results at a later point of time. Practical implications: The DRC may help companies in benchmarking themselves and gaining a better understanding about categories that must be improved, especially regarding SC aspects of DT. Originality/value: The DRC extends extant literature regarding the differentiation between SMEs and large enterprises as well as focussing on SC aspects of DT.
KW - Digital readiness
KW - Digital transformation
KW - Digitalization
KW - Industrial Internet of Things
KW - Industry 4.0
KW - SME
KW - Internet of things
KW - Austria
KW - Check-in
KW - Company size
KW - Design/methodology/approach
KW - Large enterprise
KW - Readiness assessment
KW - Small and medium-sized enterprise
KW - Supply chains
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1bf8dd85-f21c-3a5f-aff0-903c3100936c/
U2 - 10.1108/JMTM-10-2020-0382
DO - 10.1108/JMTM-10-2020-0382
M3 - Article
SN - 1741-038X
VL - 33
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
JF - Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
IS - 9
ER -