Abstract
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 12-17 |
| Seitenumfang | 6 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Infocommunications Journal |
| Jahrgang | 6 |
| Ausgabenummer | 2 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Ontology evaluation with Protégé using OWLET“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
in: Infocommunications Journal, Jahrgang 6, Nr. 2, 2014, S. 12-17.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Begutachtung
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ontology evaluation with Protégé using OWLET
AU - Lampoltshammer, T.J.
AU - Heistracher, T.
N1 - Cited By :10 Export Date: 14 December 2023 References: Blaschke, T., Object based image analysis for remote sensing (2010) ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (1), pp. 2-16; Hofmann, P., Strobl, J., Nazarkulova, A., Mapping green spaces in Bishkek-how reliable can spatial analysis be? (2011) Remote Sensing, 3 (6), pp. 1088-1103; Anders, N.S., Seijmonsbergen, A.C., Bouten, W., Segmentation optimization and stratified object-based analysis for semi-automated geomorphological mapping (2011) Remote Sensing of Environment, 115 (12), pp. 2976-2985; Moller-Jensen, L., Classification of Urban land cover based on expert systems, object models and texture (1997) Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 21 (3), pp. 291-302; Gruber, T.R., A translation approach to portable ontology specifications (1993) Knowledge Acquisition, 5 (2), pp. 199-220; Forestier, G., Puissant, A., Wemmert, C., Gançarski, P., Knowledge-based region labeling for remote sensing image interpretation (2012) Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36 (5), pp. 470-480; De Bertrand De Beuvron, F., Marc-Zwecker, S., Puissant, A., Zanni-Merk, C., From expert knowledge to formal ontologies for semantic interpretation of the Urban environment from satellite images (2013) International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems, 17 (1), pp. 55-65; Thonnat, M., Knowledge-based techniques for image processing and for image understanding (2002) Journal de Physique 4, 12 (1), pp. Pr1-189; Hofmann, P., Lettmayer, P., Blaschke, T., Belgiu, M., Wegenkittl, S., Graf, R., Lampoltshammer, T.J., Andrejchenko, V., Abia - A conceptional framework for agent based image analysis (2014) South-Eastern European Journal of Earth Observation and Geomatics, 3 (2), pp. 125-130; Arvor, D., Durieux, L., Andres, S., Laporte, M.-A., Advances in geographic object-based image analysis with ontologies: A review of main contributions and limitations from a remote sensing perspective (2013) ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 82, pp. 125-137; Hudelot, C., Thonnat, M., A cognitive vision platform for automatic recognition of natural complex objects (2003) Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2003, pp. 398-405. , Proceedings. 15th IEEE International Conference on. IEEE; Kuhn, W., Ontologies in support of activities in geographical space (2001) International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15 (7), pp. 613-631; Gennari, J.H., Musen, M.A., Fergerson, R.W., Grosso, W.E., Crubézy, M., Eriksson, H., Noy, N.F., Tu, S.W., The evolution of protégé: An environment for knowledge-based systems development (2003) International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 58 (1), pp. 89-123; Katifori, A., Torou, E., Halatsis, C., Lepouras, G., Vassilakis, C., A comparative study of four ontology visualization techniques in protege: Experiment setup and preliminary results (2006) Information Visualization, 2006, pp. 417-423. , IV 2006. Tenth International Conference on. IEEE; Calegari, S., Ciucci, D., Fuzzy ontology, fuzzy description logics and fuzzy-owl (2007) Applications of Fuzzy Sets Theory, pp. 118-126. , Springer; Belgiu, M., Lampoltshammer, T., Hofer, B., An extension of an ontology-based land cover designation approach for fuzzy rules (2013) GI-Forum 2013. Creating the GISociety, pp. 59-70. , A. Car, T. Jekel, and J. Strobl, Eds. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press; Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., Mladenic, D., A survey of ontology evaluation techniques (2005) Proceedings of the Conference on Data Mining and Data Warehouses, , SiKDD 2005. Citeseer; Maedche, A., Staab, S., Measuring similarity between ontologies (2002) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web, pp. 251-263. , Springer; Porzel, R., Malaka, R., A task-based approach for ontology evaluation (2004) ECAI Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, , Valencia, Spain. Citeseer; Brewster, C., Alani, H., Dasmahapatra, S., Wilks, Y., Data driven ontology evaluation (2004) International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), , 24-30 May 2004, Lisbon, Portugal; Lozano-Tello, A., Gómez-Pérez, A., Ontometric: A method to choose the appropriate ontology (2004) Journal of Database Management, 2 (15), pp. 1-18; Pham, D.L., Xu, C., Prince, J.L., Current methods in medical image segmentation 1 (2000) Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2 (1), pp. 315-337; Butler, H., Daly, M., Doyle, A., Gillies, S., Schaub, T., Schmidt, C., (2008) The Geojson Format Specification; Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Rudolph, S., Owl 2 web ontology language primer (2009) W3C Recommendation, 27, pp. 1-123; Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B., (1999) Modern Information Retrieval, 463. , ACM press New York; Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Van Harmelen, F., From shiq and rdf to owl: The making of a web ontology language (2003) Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 1 (1), pp. 7-26; Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R.W., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A., The protégé owl plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications (2004) The Semantic Web-ISWC 2004, pp. 229-243. , Springer; Belgiu, M., Tomljenovic, I., Lampoltshammer, T.J., Blaschke, T., Höfle, B., Ontology-based classification of building types detected from airborne laser scanning data (2014) Remote Sensing, 6 (2), pp. 1347-1366. , http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/2/1347, [Online], Available; Sohn, G., Dowman, I., Extraction of buildings from high resolution satellite data (2001) Automated Extraction of Man-Made Objects from Aerial and Space Images (III), pp. 345-355. , Balkema Publishers, Lisse; Smeulders, A.W., Worring, M., Santini, S., Gupta, A., Jain, R., Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years (2000) Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22 (12), pp. 1349-1380. , IEEE Transactions on; Jonassen, D.H., Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? (1991) Educational Technology Research and Development, 39 (3), pp. 5-14; Hawkins, D.M., The problem of overfitting (2004) Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 44 (1), pp. 1-12; Bock, J., Haase, P., Ji, Q., Volz, R., Benchmarking owl reasoners (2008) Proc. of the ARea2008 Workshop, , Tenerife, Spain (June 2008); Li, Y., Yu, Y., Heflin, J., Evaluating reasoners under realistic semantic web conditions (2012) Proceedings of the 2012 OWL Reasoner Evaluation Workshop; Baader, F., (2003) The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, , Cambridge university press; Meinel, G., Neubert, M., A comparison of segmentation programs for high resolution remote sensing data (2004) International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 35, pp. 1097-1105
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Amalgamation of formalised knowledge and real-world datasets is a pivotal challenge in the realm of information and communication technologies. Semi-automated classification of datasets can be performed by utilisation of ontologies. The detection process of image objects in Very High Resolution Satellite Imagery (VHRSI) gives a prominent example. The process of refinement of formalised expert knowledge within the related ontology still remains a challenging and time-consuming task. In this paper, the JSON2OWL Converter (OWLET) extension for Protégé is presented which supports experts during this refinement phase. The extension offers an integrated approach to transfer real-world dataset objects into the ontology modelling software for semi-automated classification. This transfer is achieved by combining open standard formats from both domains, the (Geo) Web domain (GeoJSON) and the Web ontology domain (OWL2). Thereby OWLET supports the process of accuracy analysis and accuracy fostering. By utilising the OWLET extension, experts can not only speed up their classification procedure considerably, but they can also refine their formalised knowledge by using the results of the classification process in conjunction with the outcomes of the accuracy analysis.
AB - Amalgamation of formalised knowledge and real-world datasets is a pivotal challenge in the realm of information and communication technologies. Semi-automated classification of datasets can be performed by utilisation of ontologies. The detection process of image objects in Very High Resolution Satellite Imagery (VHRSI) gives a prominent example. The process of refinement of formalised expert knowledge within the related ontology still remains a challenging and time-consuming task. In this paper, the JSON2OWL Converter (OWLET) extension for Protégé is presented which supports experts during this refinement phase. The extension offers an integrated approach to transfer real-world dataset objects into the ontology modelling software for semi-automated classification. This transfer is achieved by combining open standard formats from both domains, the (Geo) Web domain (GeoJSON) and the Web ontology domain (OWL2). Thereby OWLET supports the process of accuracy analysis and accuracy fostering. By utilising the OWLET extension, experts can not only speed up their classification procedure considerably, but they can also refine their formalised knowledge by using the results of the classification process in conjunction with the outcomes of the accuracy analysis.
KW - GIS
KW - Knowledge formalisation
KW - Ontology
KW - OWL
KW - Protégé
KW - Remote sensing
KW - Automation
KW - Geographic information systems
KW - Metals
KW - Object detection
KW - Satellite imagery
KW - Automated classification
KW - Classification procedure
KW - Classification process
KW - Formalisation
KW - Information and Communication Technologies
KW - Ontology evaluations
KW - Time-consuming tasks
KW - Very high resolution satellite imagery
KW - Classification (of information)
M3 - Article
SN - 2061-2079
VL - 6
SP - 12
EP - 17
JO - Infocommunications Journal
JF - Infocommunications Journal
IS - 2
ER -